Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I have no disagreement with Mr. Stephens opinion about the current GOP field. :(
1 posted on 01/24/2012 6:31:09 AM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: KeyLargo

Zzzzzzzzzzzzz


2 posted on 01/24/2012 6:35:35 AM PST by Mustang Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo

Stephens is an ass.


3 posted on 01/24/2012 6:36:16 AM PST by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo
I do. The GOP doesn't lose. The American people do. I do. I do not "deserve to lose" no matter WHO is running against Obama. So the Belgians "deserved to lose" because they couldn't put up a better army against Hitler? Did the Chinese "deserve to lose" a quarter of a million people because their armies couldn't unite against Japan?

This logic by the writer is lame. OBAMA DESERVES TO LOSE.

4 posted on 01/24/2012 6:36:57 AM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo

It’s January not July. I call articles like this premature ejurkulation. Defeatism is a sure sign of incompetence. President Perfect isn’t going to happen, but if we box in these squishy bastards we may well save the nation.
The alternative is a Communist Dictatorship. It’s time to quit whining and start pressing. (See my tagline.)


5 posted on 01/24/2012 6:37:29 AM PST by Steamburg (The contents of your wallet is the only language Politicians understand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo

A lot of water is going to flow under the bridge between now and November. It’s why I don’t think Obama will finish his term, regardless of who the republican candidate is.

I think it is possible that this year’s presidential election will not be the main news of the year. It will be the “B” side.


6 posted on 01/24/2012 6:38:22 AM PST by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo
That's my theory for why South Carolina gave Newt Gingrich his big primary win on Saturday: Voters instinctively prefer the idea of an entertaining Newt-Obama contest—the aspiring Caesar versus the failed Redeemer—over a dreary Mitt-Obama one. The problem is that voters also know that Gaius Gingrich is liable to deliver his prime-time speeches in purple toga while holding tight to darling Messalina's—sorry, Callista's—bejeweled fingers. A primary ballot for Mr. Gingrich is a vote for an entertaining election, not a Republican in the White House.

What an airhead. Apparently this guy just knows better than all of the Tea Party folks who have changed the face of the electorate in 2010. So he trashes them as being more interested in entertainment than in changing DC.

7 posted on 01/24/2012 6:38:42 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo

Yet another frightened lib troll…


8 posted on 01/24/2012 6:39:05 AM PST by bksanders (I think I just had my backslashed on a carriage return)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo

I’m sick of this fatalist attitude being perpetuated out there and even here. Any one of our candidates including Paul would be infinitely better than the fraud we have now. Period.


10 posted on 01/24/2012 6:40:08 AM PST by conservativebabe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo

So just who is the mythical, magical savior of the GOP? It’s easy to criticize any field of candidates. There was a time when the WSJ was above this sort of dreck.

In 2008, the Dems had a minority candidate with no experience and nothing but “hope” and a woman who married her way into a political position, with no real accomplishments of her own.


11 posted on 01/24/2012 6:40:48 AM PST by CASchack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo

The GOP does “deserve to lose”.

Except that America can not suffer four more years of Obama. The nation as whole does not deserve that.

(The people who vote for Obama deserve Obama...if only the disasterous effects of the Socialist moron could be delivered upon them selectively.)


12 posted on 01/24/2012 6:41:19 AM PST by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo

I would rather have the unknown of a GOP winner, than the known and second term and unbridled Obama communism for all. Americans will be the biggest and regretful losers if Obama wins a second term.


14 posted on 01/24/2012 6:42:06 AM PST by broken_arrow1 (I regret that I have but one life to give for my country - Nathan Hale "Patriot")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo
Another hand wringing Wall Street metrosexual.


Fight like a man!
15 posted on 01/24/2012 6:42:27 AM PST by ari-freedom (If SOPA passes, we will lose our Free Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo
Republicans deserve to lose.

Maybe, but nobody deserves four more years of bowing to the god of Affirmative Action while losing the country to Socialism.

16 posted on 01/24/2012 6:42:43 AM PST by Mikey_1962 (Obama: The Affirmative Action President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo

I can’t stand this self-abuse from so-called Republicans. The field is what it is. Newt was Speaker of the House, Santorum a Senator, Romney a Governor - in terms of experience and ability to even run a national campaign, these are the people who are at the top.

Do people like Stephens think we are going to be blessed with some super-hero, who comes down from the sky as genius and natural orator, but has never been dirtied by actually being involved in politics?


17 posted on 01/24/2012 6:42:43 AM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo
Don't waste your time. I wasted mine instead. Why anyone would think this article was worth posting is beyond me.

Poorly written and nonsensical.

19 posted on 01/24/2012 6:44:31 AM PST by faucetman ( Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo

You post this - then essentially agree with it? The writer sounds like some 80’s gay queen looking down his nose at folks who don’t eat sprouts. What a boring, predictable, nose in the air load of yawn.


22 posted on 01/24/2012 6:45:09 AM PST by GOPJ (GAS WAS $1.85 per gallon on the day Obama was Inaugurated! - - freeper Gaffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo
"Finally, there are the men not in the field: Mitch Daniels, Paul Ryan, Chris Christie, Jeb Bush, Haley Barbour.
This was the GOP A-Team, the guys who should have showed up to the first debate but didn't because running for president is hard and the spouses were reluctant.
Nothing commends them for it. If this election is as important as they all say it is, they had a duty to step up.
Abraham Lincoln did not shy from the contest of 1860 because of Mary Todd.
If Mr. Obama wins in November—or, rather, when he does—the failure will lie as heavily on their shoulders as it will with the nominee."
What a pathetic piece of "journalism" from a pathetic piece of a "journalist"…

You'll have plenty to cry over upon Newt's landslide victory.

Cc: bstephens@wsj.com

24 posted on 01/24/2012 6:46:59 AM PST by bksanders (I think I just had my backslashed on a carriage return)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo

The writer will wake up the day after the election, and he’ll have to write a column explaining how the American people were so wrong to fire Obama and elected the GOP candidate who “deserved to lose”.

The writer has no understanding about how angry the American people feel right now, and how that anger is just going to be increasing until the election. The writer needs to get out of his ivory tower and get out amongst the people, and I do mean the real people, not the crowd he hangs out with.

The writer is either completely ignorant about how much the American people are seeking to replace Obama, or he’s just making stupid statements in the hope of making things happen.


26 posted on 01/24/2012 6:47:41 AM PST by adorno (<)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo

This whole “bad GOP field” assumption is like the “bush tax cuts didn’t work” assumptive question thrown at Mitt last night.

The fact is, the field was not that bad. Is not that bad. It’s also not that good, but there is not much of a bench from which to pull candidates. And the Dems had the same problem in 2008. Look at Obama’s congressional record in 2008 compared to Newt’s now. Which one has more accomplishment? Which one is more qualified?

The problem is that anyone that REALLY could do a bang up job as president is not stupid enough to run for the office. The quality of the congress is not what it was, and the governors have similar problems because so many of them, even the Republicans, have abandoned their conservative roots.

The pool is just low quality, and its gonna bite us. And only part of that “bite” is in who gets elected (as in 2008) but, more importantly, what those elected end up doing in office.

What’s bad about electing the fox to be the keeper of the hen house is what he does once elected. And Gignrich, the front runner, is the closest thing we have to a conservative, but he’s no conservative.

Fortunately, the whold bureaucracy is about to collapse of its own weight so it doesn’t matter all that much WHO is elected. The only ones that have a chance of coming out of this relatively unscathed is the preppers, not any voters.

It’s time to revisit Claire Wolfe.


27 posted on 01/24/2012 6:47:42 AM PST by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo

No it doesn’t


30 posted on 01/24/2012 6:49:04 AM PST by stuartcr ("In this election year of 12, how deep into their closets will we delve?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson