Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin: 'Teavangelical' shot caller
Human Events ^ | January 24, 2012 | Tony Lee

Posted on 01/24/2012 12:08:13 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

South Carolina represents the heart of the conservative movement because its Republican voters are fierce fiscal and social conservatives, which means they fervently support the Tea Party and evangelicals. These voters are now popularly referred to as “Teavangelicals” and, predictably, dominated the Palmetto State’s primary.

According to exit polling from Saturday’s first-in-the-South primary, 64 percent of those who voted in the GOP primary in South Carolina supported the Tea Party and another 27 percent were neutral. Only 8 percent opposed.

In addition, 65 percent of primary voters were “Born-Again or Evangelical Christian.”

What happened in South Carolina is important for two reasons. First, the Republican party is becoming more like South Carolina than New Hampshire. Second, because of the lackluster field of Republican candidates, many on the right have tried to make up for the deficiencies of the candidates by lending them their name and support.

Nowhere was this more intense than in South Carolina. Trying to push establishment favorite Mitt Romney to a quick victory, figures the mainstream media have tagged as part of the next generation of national conservative leaders -- such as New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, and Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell -- went to South Carolina en masse to attempt to deliver a knockout blow.

But something funny happened on the way to Romney’s coronation: Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin stepped in and essentially said, “Not so fast, my friends.” And in doing so, Palin showed that she is the leader whose judgment Teavangelicals may trust the most.

Consider how Romney -- and, by proxy, the establishment -- got bloodied in South Carolina.

First, Palin said, contrary to what was being conventionally said at the time, that the mainstream media and President Barack Obama would want to face Romney in the general election.

When Rick Perry and Gingrich attacked, at times inarticulately, Romney’s record while at the head of Bain, Palin jumped in and cleaned it up. She said free enterprise and capitalism should be fiercely defended, but that if Romney’s basis for his candidacy is that he would be a job creator like the one he supposedly was while at Bain, that Romney should simply prove that Bain had indeed created the 100,000 jobs he said they did. And created them in the United States.

Then, further proving that she was not on the GOP establishment’s plantation, Palin also called on Romney to release his taxes. Soon after, even Romney’s supporters such as Christie followed suit.

By not falling in line with the GOP establishment, Palin guaranteed Romney’s Bain and tax issues were not put to rest. Romney’s bungling and unsteady responses to both issues left him vulnerable for Gingrich to have a chance at cutting into what many thought was Romney’s insurmountable 20+ point lead in South Carolina.

And Gingrich took full advantage of his opportunity when he came out swinging against questioner Juan Williams at the FOX News/Wall Street Journal debate last week, when he defiantly defended conservative principles by telling Williams that saying he wanted to be a pay check president instead of a “food stamp” president was not racist because he was being inclusive of all Americans. Gingrich received a thunderous standing ovation and conservative heavyweights such as Rush Limbaugh praised the former speaker on the airwaves. Two-thirds of those who voted in Saturday’s primary said the debates influenced their decision, and Gingrich’s standoff with Williams convinced many that Gingrich could fiercely articulate conservatism, combat the mainstream media and be inclusive.

At the very moment when Gingrich swung himself back into the game, Palin ensured Gingrich’s momentum would not wane by going on FOX News’ “Hannity” the day after the Fox News/Wall Street Journal debate and saying that, in order for the primary process to continue, and if she were a South Carolinian, she would vote for Gingrich

“There’s no question we saw it help us in fundraising,” Gingrich told Greta Van Susteren on FOX News’ “On The Record” last Thursday, two days after Palin’s comments. “We saw it help us in volunteers. We saw people, all of a sudden, on the phones. She has a significant following in the Republican Party.

“To have her say she’d vote for me in South Carolina... that was a big break and it really helped us a lot.”

In the same interview in which she said she would vote for Gingrich in South Carolina, Palin also said that, in order for the process to keep going, a conservative candidate -- whether it be Rick Perry, Rick Santorum or Newt Gingrich -- would have to “take one for the team” and drop out sometime down the line.

After the conversation intensified about how conservative candidates should get out of the way to not siphon away votes from the anti-Romney alternative (especially after former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman dropped out to not take votes away from Romney), Perry dropped out of the race two days later, which ended up giving Gingrich much more breathing room on an election day full of inclement weather throughout South Carolina.

Gingrich defeated Romney in South Carolina, 40 percent to 28 percent. In addition, though 66 percent of primary voters approved of Nikki Haley’s job performance (if not for Sarah Palin’s endorsement, Haley would not be governor), Gingrich did better among those voters than Romney, 42 percent to 30 percent, according to exit polling, proving that Haley’s endorsement did not amount to much when up against Palin’s. Haley did not even bother to show up at Romney’s election night event.

While stumping for Romney last week, Bob McDonnell often said, “character counts and values matter,” in what was an obvious jab at Gingrich.

But “Teavangelicals” are trusting Palin.

As the race turns to Florida, both Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio, fully aware of what occurred in South Carolina, have decided to stay neutral.

Whether Palin uses her considerable clout to exert any more influence on this election cycle -- her keynote address at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in February seems like a prime venue to do so -- remains to be seen.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: Florida; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: christianvote; evangelicals; florida; freepressforpalin; gingrich; newt; palin; romney; sarahpalin; sc2012; southcarolina; talkradio; teaparty; teapartyrebellion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-63 next last
What he said.
1 posted on 01/24/2012 12:08:17 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

She came out for the only obvious choice, once that choice became apparent.

Amazing and uncommon brilliance.


2 posted on 01/24/2012 12:12:19 PM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Well, the GOP-E poo-bahs told everyone repeatedly that she should just be a cheerleader and not a candidate. They certainly weren't careful about what they wished for and now they have it.

Next for GOP leaders: Stopping Sarah Palin

3 posted on 01/24/2012 12:15:23 PM PST by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

FyL


4 posted on 01/24/2012 12:16:39 PM PST by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
Amazing and uncommon brilliance.

I don't hardly every criticize Freepers directly, but you are truly a jerk. You are relentless in your attacks on Sarah. You have an obsession with criticizing her that is unsettling. I am glad that I am not your neighbor.

I have yet to see a thread where you did not attack her.

You are simply crude and rude rolled up into one.

5 posted on 01/24/2012 12:30:07 PM PST by sand88 (Hey Rove et al, I will, with great pleasure, NOT cast a vote for the Statist Mitt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Grizzly scared off the RINO.


6 posted on 01/24/2012 12:39:32 PM PST by DTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sand88
I don't hardly every criticize Freepers directly, but you are truly a jerk.

Yeah, that's probably fair. So what?

You are relentless in your attacks on Sarah.

I sleep from time to time. Do you take breaks from calling her by her first name?

You have an obsession with criticizing her that is unsettling.

I do more than criticize, but why should that be a problem?
Is it wrong? Does it make her sad? Does it make you sad?

I am glad that I am not your neighbor.

We agree.

I have yet to see a thread where you did not attack her.

Personally, I've posted a buttload of threads that had nothing to do with her.

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:humblegunner/index?tab=articles

I'm dreadful sorry if the fact that I have an opinion bothers you.

7 posted on 01/24/2012 12:49:11 PM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sand88

I think someone got the ZOT


8 posted on 01/24/2012 12:52:39 PM PST by MissMagnolia (Being powerful is like being a lady. If you have to tell people you are, you aren't. (M.Thatcher))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

OUCH!


9 posted on 01/24/2012 12:57:22 PM PST by Randy Larsen (ROTFLMFAO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MissMagnolia
I think someone got the ZOT

Really? Who?

Share with us, don't be shy!

10 posted on 01/24/2012 1:01:21 PM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
These voters are now popularly referred to as “Teavangelicals”

Never heard of the term until this article.

11 posted on 01/24/2012 1:02:17 PM PST by frogjerk (OBAMA NOV 2012 = HORSEMEAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissMagnolia; humblegunner; sand88

No. Both humblegunner and sand88 are still there


12 posted on 01/24/2012 1:03:11 PM PST by NathanR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Stupid headline.

I read the whole article and didn’t read anything about a caller getting shot by a “tealeafwhatever.” What was the caller shot with? What caliber round was used?


13 posted on 01/24/2012 1:05:05 PM PST by Larry Lucido (Six months ago I was all "Go away Newt." Now I'm "Eh, he's the best we got, so 'Go Newt.'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Character does count, and values do matter. But unless one is a relativist and everything reduces to process, then one must believe in somethings are true. Newt believes that underlying our political system are not just sets of values, but fundamental truths about mankind. Liberals don’t. They feel that the Constitution is no more than a temporary arrangement, based on the needs of the time, and which may now be regarded, as they regard the terms of magna carta, mere historical survivals. But we are closer in spirit and fact to the men of that time than the liberal is willing to admit. And that instrument of government, which we call the constitution, remains a profound check on heedless change based on what the Baby-boomers think ought to happen.


14 posted on 01/24/2012 1:05:05 PM PST by RobbyS (Christus rex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

(I know you didn’t write the headline, btw).


15 posted on 01/24/2012 1:06:39 PM PST by Larry Lucido (Six months ago I was all "Go away Newt." Now I'm "Eh, he's the best we got, so 'Go Newt.'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sand88

“....but you are truly a jerk.”

Ya, but he’s our jerk and we aint trading him.


16 posted on 01/24/2012 1:10:03 PM PST by READINABLUESTATE ("We must hang together, gentlemen...else, we shall most assuredly hang separately." - Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

[She came out for the only obvious choice, once that choice became apparent.

Amazing and uncommon brilliance.]

Just as we can expect an uncommonly brilliant snide remark from you about Palin no matter what she says.

Now that we have the candidates in context, she would have done well if she’d run and that eats some people up.


17 posted on 01/24/2012 1:10:36 PM PST by FastCoyote (I am intolerant of the intolerable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MissMagnolia; humblegunner

I believe humblegunner has a special protected status.


18 posted on 01/24/2012 1:13:01 PM PST by null and void (Day 1099 of America's ObamaVacation from reality [Heroes aren't made, Frank, they're cornered...])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sand88; humblegunner; Eaker
You are simply crude and rude rolled up into one.

Well....yeah! That's why we keep him around!

19 posted on 01/24/2012 1:13:52 PM PST by Larry Lucido (Six months ago I was all "Go away Newt." Now I'm "Eh, he's the best we got, so 'Go Newt.'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FastCoyote
Just as we can expect an uncommonly brilliant snide remark from you about Palin no matter what she says.

Yes, that provides a counterpoint to the assignation of brilliance to Palin no matter what she says.

Is that a problem? You like her, I don't.

20 posted on 01/24/2012 1:17:33 PM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sand88; humblegunner
You are simply crude and rude rolled up into one.

Shirley ewe jest! This truly, really, for-sure is the kinder/gentler humblegunner. Didn't you get the memo? I'm not joking either.

21 posted on 01/24/2012 1:18:26 PM PST by houeto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: null and void
I have had that suggested to me as well.

But Newt's words are what they are. She made an impact to the chagrin of some who frequent Free Republic.

“There’s no question we saw it help us in fundraising,” Gingrich told Greta Van Susteren on FOX News’ “On The Record” last Thursday, two days after Palin’s comments.
“We saw it help us in volunteers. We saw people, all of a sudden, on the phones. She has a significant following in the Republican Party.

To have her say she’d vote for me in South Carolina... that was a big break and it really helped us a lot.”

22 posted on 01/24/2012 1:18:40 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: null and void
I believe humblegunner has a special protected status.

Well I am an endangered species but not one recognized by the Feds.

I said mean things to them too, you see.....

23 posted on 01/24/2012 1:20:22 PM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MissMagnolia; humblegunner
I think someone got the ZOT

Congratulations!

You are the 1000th person to fall for it!

Please procede to the current Freepathon thread and donate.

24 posted on 01/24/2012 1:21:09 PM PST by houeto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: READINABLUESTATE; humblegunner

We can’t spare this jerk. He fights.


25 posted on 01/24/2012 1:21:51 PM PST by Cyber Liberty ("If the past sits in judgment on the present, the future will be lost." --Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: houeto
Please procede to the current Freepathon thread and donate

Twice!


Click the Pic!

26 posted on 01/24/2012 1:26:09 PM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner; sand88; NathanR

Humblegunner, after reading your comments, I clicked on your profile to perhaps gain some understanding of where you might be coming from. The account says ‘banned or suspended’. Mea Culpa .... my apologies as you are obviously not.


27 posted on 01/24/2012 1:29:09 PM PST by MissMagnolia (Being powerful is like being a lady. If you have to tell people you are, you aren't. (M.Thatcher))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: NathanR; sand88; MissMagnolia; humblegunner
8 posted on Tuesday, January 24, 2012 2:52:39 PM by MissMagnolia: “I think someone got the ZOT”

Humblegunner ginned up a fake banned page. I'm guessing it's there so people would see it, make comments like what you just said, and then get proved wrong.

I've had my own run-ins with Humblegunner. His behavior seems to be tolerated — as someone else said, he seems to have “protected status” — and since nothing can be done about him, I think it's best to read what he says, see if it makes sense, and then either take it or leave it. He won't change his tactics anyway, and fighting him seems to encourage him rather than reduce what he does.

Some people are like that.

28 posted on 01/24/2012 1:34:07 PM PST by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MissMagnolia
The account says ‘banned or suspended’

I'm a Ninja.


29 posted on 01/24/2012 1:35:15 PM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MissMagnolia
I clicked on your profile to perhaps gain some understanding of where you might be coming from.

You'd have better luck trying to divide by zero.

30 posted on 01/24/2012 1:35:36 PM PST by houeto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MissMagnolia

Humble has a fake ZOT.

I think he lost some money in an oil deal or something, nothing else could account for the vitriol he spews.


31 posted on 01/24/2012 1:38:22 PM PST by itsahoot (You are no longer a person, you are now a Unit when you need health care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: darrellmaurina
I've had my own run-ins with Humblegunner.

Due to your blogpimping. Post your content in full.
Free Republic isn't here to act as advertising for your blog.

His behavior seems to be tolerated

What behavior? Please specify. Disliking blogpimps? Not fawning over Palin?

since nothing can be done about him

I'm subject to the same rules that you are.

He won't change his tactics

I have tactics?

fighting him seems to encourage him

We agree.

Some people are like that

Yep.

32 posted on 01/24/2012 1:44:01 PM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

Â, sô desu ka


33 posted on 01/24/2012 1:44:29 PM PST by MissMagnolia (Being powerful is like being a lady. If you have to tell people you are, you aren't. (M.Thatcher))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: MissMagnolia; humblegunner
“...to perhaps gain some understanding of where you might be coming from...”

I used to work for a guy that was a nice-enough guy, just VERY blunt in his assessment of things. Didn't care who he pissed off. Lots of folks would leave as they took it too personally. I figured it was just due to his upbringing, etc. and let it run off my back.

Same goes for humblegunner’s posts. And despite the “jerk” factor - his assesment of Palin’s decision is reasonable. And as a Palin fan, I can see her (or any politician) waiting to see who has the best chance while still holding the most conservative values. If she does run for office again some day, might not be best to be saddled with “...and she backed Santorum that then went on to a distant third place finish...” (disclosure - I had been donating a little to Santorum earlier).

34 posted on 01/24/2012 1:45:29 PM PST by 21twelve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

I haven’t posted one link to any articles I’ve written since you jumped all over me a year ago for violating s rule I didn’t even know existed.

Since then, I posted one article on Free Republic involving a 9/11 memorial service at Fort Leonard Wood, with full text, put it in the appropriate place at Free Republic and deliberately didn’t even include a link so neither you nor anyone else could accuse me of “wanting hits.”

So lay off the accusations. They’re not true.

You’re rude. You admit to that and are proud of it. I follow the rules once I know what they are, and you can’t accuse me of violating them.

Now let’s end this before either of us say more things to each other we’d rather not say. You and I have better things to do than fight.


35 posted on 01/24/2012 1:54:35 PM PST by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: darrellmaurina
I haven’t posted one link to any articles I’ve written since you jumped all over me a year ago for violating s rule I didn’t even know existed.

Omit the link and post the article, I'm sure that would be welcome.

You’re rude.

Perhaps a bit when needed.

Now let’s end this before either of us say more things to each other we’d rather not say.

Fine, but I was just getting warmed up. ;-)

36 posted on 01/24/2012 2:00:43 PM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: READINABLUESTATE
Ya, but he’s our jerk and we aint trading him.

Yea, I smile at times reading his comments, but I guess I didn't have enough coffee to be fully awake when I let loose!! I should have just ignored him.

He's cranky and that's the way he is. He is more pathetic than anything else. I will just continue to smile at his lame attacks.

37 posted on 01/24/2012 2:28:14 PM PST by sand88 (Hey Rove et al, I will, with great pleasure, NOT cast a vote for the Statist Mitt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner; darrellmaurina
darrellmaurina ~ You’re rude.

humblegunner ~ Perhaps a bit when needed.

humblegunner always sees the need...

38 posted on 01/24/2012 2:47:24 PM PST by null and void (Day 1099 of America's ObamaVacation from reality [Heroes aren't made, Frank, they're cornered...])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: sand88; humblegunner
I have said the exact same thing? ...what is she waiting for? ...what's taking her so long to make an endorsement?

I have posted for a long time I thought Rick Perry & Sarah would team up.

But the longer she waited & watched Rick Perry, it was obvious that he was not ready for a national campaign.

There were lots of Sarah Palin fans like me getting irritated and fustrated that Sarah waited so long.

But now it's on!

Sarah, Rick Perry, Chuck Norris and Jim Robinson have all backed Newt. ...me too.

Newt is on record as saying Sarah would be part of his administration.

PS. Lucky you didn't run into the old Humblegunner, this is the new, kinder, gentler Humblegunner. A true transformation.

39 posted on 01/24/2012 2:51:21 PM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sand88

Talking about folks behind their back is not only cowardly and rude, it’s against Free Republic protocol.

Which of the above applies to your trashing me without pinging me?

Shall I hazard a guess?


40 posted on 01/24/2012 2:53:26 PM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk
These voters are now popularly referred to as “Teavangelicals”

1st I've heard the term. ...but I live in the south, it takes a while for news to reach us.

41 posted on 01/24/2012 2:54:23 PM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
Due to your blogpimping. Post your content in full. Free Republic isn't here to act as advertising for your blog.

LOL, seems Free Republic was smacked with giant lawsuits over "blogpimping" news sources, and settled by NOT "posting contents in full."

Reminds me of Apple suing Xerox over the windows GUI Xerox developed.

Whatever. Everyone needs a hobby, and attacking Sarah and bloggers is yours - as well as riling them up.

Although why FReepers don't just disagree right back with you, just as bluntly, is beyond me.

Oh and BTW, it really is "Sarah." Because that reflects the personal heart connection she's made with so many millions of Americans that's terrified TPTB. Yeah, she's a politician too, which is never a good thing. But she knows that, too - and talks about it. What other politician does that?

Ninja. How cute.

:: snort ::

42 posted on 01/24/2012 2:58:13 PM PST by Talisker (Apology accepted, Captain Needa.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Talisker
Because that reflects the personal heart connection she's made with so many millions of Americans


43 posted on 01/24/2012 3:07:57 PM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

humblegunner you’re a dickweed with zero understanding of Sarah as a conservative and what she is as a human being. Wife, Mother and fighter for what is best for our nation. Thrust into a national spotlight where even here on the best website ever created for conservatives dip sticks like yourself can’t help but be jealous or just pick at her with stupid ass snipes.


44 posted on 01/24/2012 3:14:40 PM PST by liberty or death
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

45 posted on 01/24/2012 3:22:13 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (You can't invade the US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.~Admiral Yamamoto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: liberty or death
humblegunner you’re a dickweed with zero understanding of Sarah as a conservative and what she is as a human being

You're right, I should have quit that opinion halfway through because mean people filed frivolous posts.

Wife, Mother and fighter for what is best for our nation.

By God, she's another Esther! She is sent by God for such times as these.

Thrust into a national spotlight

She was thrust? Unwilling?

dip sticks like yourself can’t help but be jealous

Any criticism is jealousy? There isn't room for criticism?

She ain't the Pope. Sorry to bust your bubble.

46 posted on 01/24/2012 3:24:17 PM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; TheOldLady

Appropriate.

I’m frying chicken tonight.

Chunk chicken, quite nummy. With honey mustard dipping sauce.

You betcha.


47 posted on 01/24/2012 3:27:25 PM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

Pass this on to your friends humblegunner

lets see the truth on this unsolved murder.
Mom of Murdered Obama Gay Lover Speaks Up

http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2010/07/25/mom-of-murdered-obama-gay-lover-speaks-up/

It was four years today that Obama friend/lover was murdered\
On 12/23/11 no one brought to justice.

http://www.larrysinclair.org/2011/12/23/it-was-four-years-today-that-obama-friendlover-was-murdered/


48 posted on 01/24/2012 3:28:45 PM PST by OPS4 (Ops4 God Bless America!Jesus is Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OPS4

What exactly does Obama’s gay buddy have to do with Sarah Palin?

Were they related or something?

Please explain.


49 posted on 01/24/2012 3:32:40 PM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

My local Popeye's gives me 10 thighs for $7.99

50 posted on 01/24/2012 3:36:10 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (You can't invade the US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.~Admiral Yamamoto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson