Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VU4G10

Some of the same people who see Newt as extreme, grandiose, harsh, zany...criticize him for not being in favor of draconian measures to deal with illegal aliens.
One size does not fit all. Trying to make it so would be catastrophic, and we’d lose face trying to put it into practice against a constant parade of pathetic victims trotted out daily by the Dems, while the media hammered us. Newt’s plan is sensible and feasible, and less imperfect than the alternatives. Makes the best of a bad business, as the old timers used to say.
I realize that’s unpopular thinking around here, so for the record I do understand all parts of “illegal.”


45 posted on 01/25/2012 12:10:12 PM PST by Lady Lucky (A tea party in name only is worse than no tea party at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lady Lucky

Actually, in this thread, conservatives seem more to be complaining that Gingrich is calling them inhumane, not that he disagrees with them.

Gingrich may have a rational plan. That doesn’t mean he has to attack those who disagree with him as being inhumane, or call them “anti-immigrant” as if they don’t like any foreigners.


60 posted on 01/25/2012 12:56:18 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson