Posted on 01/25/2012 3:14:51 PM PST by Syncro
I quit using Drudge. I heard about this on our local talk radio show this morning. I’ve had warnings pop up when I clicked on Drudge links from work.
> You may be right about her wanting BO to win. Therefore she can continue to take the stage and bytch about what a shape the country is in all because of the Demonrats (and RINO’s too but she won’t say that). Get a real Conservative in the White House and she’ll be diminished, imho.
I think you nailed it. I’ve been saying for the last couple of years (and taking quite a bit of heat for it on FR) that Coulter has increasingly become first and foremost an attention wh*re more interested in generating buzz for herself and flogging her books instead of espousing conservative principles. And the best chance she has to do this is if she’s got a socialist in office for easy pickins.
I think this is partly desperation as her good looks are deteriorating. Women with principle age like Margaret Thatcher, women with lack of character age like Pelousy, stuffing Botox into the face and screeching.
Coulter is sad. Sad sad sad.
Since we’re reviewing videos (ancient ones at that), let’s look at a very recent one Glenn Beck posted regarding Newt’s recent denial of his theretofore hero, FDR, whom he said was the best president of the 20th century:
Let’s face it, Newt is not only an unelectable hothead, but a closet progressive.
I am waiting for the punchline.
I agree! :)
Coulter is against homosexual marriage.
When she spoke to GOProud she convinced them that it was a bad idea, and they took it off of their agenda.
Supporting Romney is anathema to that position.
The single most important issue to me this election is the repeal of Obamacare. According to Norm, I don’t even need to vote if Mitt gets the nomination.
How’s that strike you Ann?
“I hope those who bought her books will stop it.”
In all honesty her treatment of conservatives makes me rather sad. I enjoyed her past books and enjoyed being able to reward her for writing them. I will never buy another book by her, unless she does an about face and apologizes profusely and with honest retribution.
I am doubtful that she will apologize, so I will use my disposable income on other authors.
LOL, she hardly gave a full-throated invective against gay marriage, which she always does against everything she's really against. The implication in her remarks is to quiet down about it "for now." That makes it easier to sneak it through the courts like happened in Massachusetts under Governor Mitt Romney. The more people raise the gay marriage agenda, the more the public does everything they can to try to stop it, including influencing the courts, amending the constitution, etc.
Well in that case do the right thing and endorse homosexual marriage.
There are no gay homosexuals, they are homosexuals period.
Let's not buy into their stealing a perfectly good word and using it to describe a doomed lifestyle.
Calling them gay is supporting their lifestyle.
Using your logic, I guess the best thing for you to do is approve of homosexual marriage, that’s the path to keeping it from multiplying in your view it seems.
Thank you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.