[Ghost of Philip Marlowe]

And one more point, and this is to attack the author and editor of this pathetic “article.”

Do you not see the contradiction of terms in your own headline?

If he is “closet” about something, that means he has kept it a secret and that there is no evidence.

Has your “journalism” really stooped to the point of alleging that someone has feelings that you have no outward evidence to support?

[Former Fetus]

your own headline [...] your “journalism”

Sorry, it is not MY headline or MY journalism. I just posted an article written by somebody else!

[Zionist Conspirator]

"This pathetic article" is pro-Newt and defends him from the charge of anti-Semitism and from the knee-jerk hostility of Jewish liberals. Did you not see the question mark at the end of the title?

Sometimes it pays to read the article you are criticizing.

[Lurking Libertarian]

And one more point, and this is to attack the author and editor of this pathetic “article.” Do you not see the contradiction of terms in your own headline? If he is “closet” about something, that means he has kept it a secret and that there is no evidence. Has your “journalism” really stooped to the point of alleging that someone has feelings that you have no outward evidence to support?

You obviously didn't read the article, which is a defense of Gingrich against another author's accusations.