Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Thane_Banquo
Generally, having $3 million in a Swiss bank account and failing to disclose it is considered a sign that something nefarious would perhaps be going on. At the least, it would cause someone in the financial industry to be investigated by his or her employer and possibly the SEC. Most likely the person would get fired.

It's wrong if your financial services company doesn't disclose it, but is it legal if you don't disclose it yourself?

But I get your point that someone who's been in the financial services industry should know that.

75 posted on 01/26/2012 5:15:57 PM PST by St_Thomas_Aquinas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: St_Thomas_Aquinas

Generally, I have to report anything that is considered “reportable”under the relevant law. Basically, individual stocks and bonds. And yes, I am required by federal law to report it to my employer. If I had a $3 million reportable account and didn’t report it, I would be violating federal law.

But the definition of reportable is different in Mitt’s case. From what I understand, he had to report everything. He didn’t.


78 posted on 01/26/2012 5:23:45 PM PST by Thane_Banquo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson