Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Update: Judge weighs arguments in Barack Obama ballot dispute; Orly Taitz involved
Ledger Enquirer ^ | 1/26/2012 | Associated Press

Posted on 01/26/2012 2:40:03 PM PST by devattel

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last
"Interesting" slant on today's hearing.
1 posted on 01/26/2012 2:40:18 PM PST by devattel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: devattel
Orly Taitz involved

Dang, it looked good right up until that point.

Oh well.

2 posted on 01/26/2012 2:43:46 PM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devattel
Similar complaints have been filed in other states with no success

Don't believe this is true. This complain is not about removing Obozo for not being qualified. But about keeping him off the State Election Ballot because he is not a "natural born" U.S. Citizen as required by the Constitution. The GA SOS is charged with insuring that all candidates meet the requirements for holding the office the candidate is running for. That is within the power of the SOS.

3 posted on 01/26/2012 2:46:12 PM PST by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devattel

Jablonsky boycotted the hearing... I know next to nothing about legal matters, but can’t believe boycotting a hearing would be well received by the Judge. Perhaps Benito Obamalini’s advisors felt that if the boycott’s results in a default judgment, they will simply appeal to a higher (possibly liberal) Judge?


4 posted on 01/26/2012 2:46:54 PM PST by Made In The USA (This post may be recorded for quality purposes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devattel

Bring it on, Open the can of worms.

Expose the dark recesses of the Obastards past.


5 posted on 01/26/2012 2:47:35 PM PST by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devattel

Judge ain’t weighing nothing...he is finding the purple lipped prince in default judgement.


6 posted on 01/26/2012 2:49:13 PM PST by IrishPennant (We don't want to work so we go to work to make enough money not to work...Huh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishPennant

First question, first debate from Newt: Your majesty, why did you not defend your ballot standing concerning the ballot issue in Ga?

Answer, ah, well, you know, ah, there were some rather extreme matters there, beyond the State control because you see, that Judge is now in jail for questioning my lineage. So, you keep asking, and you will be joining him.


7 posted on 01/26/2012 2:52:31 PM PST by Mouton (Voting is an opiate of the electorate. Nothing changes no matter who wins..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: All


Help End The Obama Era In 2012
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


8 posted on 01/26/2012 2:53:04 PM PST by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Made In The USA
Jablonsky boycotted the hearing... I know next to nothing about legal matters, but can’t believe boycotting a hearing would be well received by the Judge.

According to the plaintiffs, the judge informed them prior to the hearing that he would be entering a default judgement against Obama because he and counsel failed to appear.

The plaintiffs requested an expedited hearing to present their evidence for the record, and it was granted. It went pretty well, until Taitz took the floor.

9 posted on 01/26/2012 2:54:54 PM PST by justlurking (The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good WOMAN (Sgt. Kimberly Munley) with a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Danae; edge919; DiogenesLamp; LucyT; little jeremiah; hoosiermama; butterdezillion; melancholy

At short glance this one seems a bit better article.


10 posted on 01/26/2012 2:55:37 PM PST by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Made In The USA
I know next to nothing about legal matters, but can’t believe boycotting a hearing would be well received by the Judge.

As a general rule, you don't want to insult the judge and the court itself by failing to show without cause. Judges frequently have egos *and* have a need to uphold the dignity and authority of the court.

But this is Obama. Sometimes it's Good to be King.

11 posted on 01/26/2012 2:57:31 PM PST by Scoutmaster (You knew the job was dangerous when you took it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Made In The USA

Judge pulled lawyers in to chambers and state he would give a default judgement and recogmend BhO would not be placed on the ballot. He did allow each of the three lawyers to enter their evidence for the record and allow a certain some witnesses. There are severl synopsis of the hearing posted on FR.


12 posted on 01/26/2012 2:59:00 PM PST by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: justlurking

“”According to the plaintiffs, the judge informed them prior to the hearing that he would be entering a default judgement against Obama because he and counsel failed to appear. The plaintiffs requested an expedited hearing to present their evidence for the record, and it was granted. It went pretty well, until Taitz took the floor.””

Where do we find that or more information on what happened today - the link was pretty sparse in details....


13 posted on 01/26/2012 3:08:03 PM PST by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama
From 2010 and eligibility issue in AZ. link

The real issue in this is a President is not elected to these 49 United States, but Constitutionally must be elected by all 50 states, unless they have seceded from the Union as the Confederates did. Unless an event as that has taken place, the Constitution is not about Electoral Colleges or being ratified by Congress, but it is about the Union electing a President of all 50 states. Understand that any President can loose the popular vote as President Bush had, and win the electoral votes, along with numerous states, but no President can be President of these United States if he is not on the ballot or certified in all 50 states.

Scholars have missed this ultimate check and balance in the "silence of the Constitution". No state can keep any legal candidate off the ballot, but a state can keep anyone off the ballot who does not provide legal documentation they are qualified to be President.

That is the Constitution at it's core in the Articles concerning the Presidency. 49 states can state a fraud can be President in their super majority, but if one state demands proof and the candidate does not provide that legal proof, the one state in checks and balances can negate a national Presidential Election.

There is no court nor Supreme Court which can undo this

14 posted on 01/26/2012 3:09:31 PM PST by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

Do you possibly have a link for this language?


15 posted on 01/26/2012 3:12:28 PM PST by jcsjcm (This country was built on exceptionalism and individualism. In God we Trust - Laus Deo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: devattel

I wouldnt want to be riding the MARTA the day that ruling comes down.


16 posted on 01/26/2012 3:13:06 PM PST by RummyChick (It's a Satan Sandwich with Satan Fries on the side - perfect for Obama 666)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama; Flotsam_Jetsome; Berlin_Freeper; Hotlanta Mike; Silentgypsy; repubmom; ...
.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

17 posted on 01/26/2012 3:17:03 PM PST by LucyT ( NB. ~ Pakistan was NOT on the U.S. State Department's "no travel" list in 1981. ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: LucyT
Update: Obama's GA Ballot...: Judge Wanted To Immediately Enter Default Judgment Against Obama
18 posted on 01/26/2012 3:22:29 PM PST by GregNH (................GO PATS!.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Thank You Rush
Where do we find that or more information on what happened today - the link was pretty sparse in details....

Long thread here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2838105/posts

See post #812 for a report on what happened.

19 posted on 01/26/2012 3:24:57 PM PST by justlurking (The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good WOMAN (Sgt. Kimberly Munley) with a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: devattel

The judge has issued a default judgement after allowing the lawyers and witnesses to speak so that everything is officially on record. The Georgia SOS has already stated he would abide by the judge’s ruling. I know Tenn and Az have similar court complaints pending. Wouldn’t it be sweet if this would snowball into a great many states tossing his stupid, illegal azz off the ballot. Here is an interesting link.

http://thecaptiansquarters.blogspot.com/2012/01/obamas-georgia-ballot-hearing.html


20 posted on 01/26/2012 3:30:17 PM PST by Xyz22 (Snakebit again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson