Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: D-fendr; null and void

Kaspersky has quite a good reputation. Good detection rate, good protection, aggressive if that’s your preferred way.

Not mine these days, but if I wanted active protection rather than passive, they’d be top on the list, unquestionably.


25 posted on 01/26/2012 8:56:50 PM PST by Fire_on_High (WTB new tagline, PST!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Fire_on_High

I’m not being very clear.

I respect kaspersky as software engineers, viruses, etc.

But Stuxnet involves international politics: Israel, Russia, iran, US, Pakistan, etc., etc.

Who is doing what and who thinks who can do what or thinks who is doing what... all has diplomatic and military impact.

I don’t know what influence the Russian government has on Kaspersky’s research and reporting on this matter; it would not be absurd to think the government has considerable interest and therefore a lot to do with what is reported.

I don’t know, but that’s why i said I’d be more comfortable with this report if it didn’t come from a Russian firm, where, i believe the government has a heavier hand in industry.


27 posted on 01/27/2012 1:05:37 AM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson