Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/27/2012 11:24:06 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

Instead of raising taxes on millionaires, why not lower the taxes on the rest of us?


2 posted on 01/27/2012 11:29:07 AM PST by Veggie Todd (I don't mind you hitting me, Frank, but take it easy on the Bacardi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

—His point is — tax code treats his secretary unfairly—

Message to Warren: Yeah, we get that. We just disagree with you.


3 posted on 01/27/2012 11:30:10 AM PST by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

So instead of jacking up the rates on those who are prosperous, how about reducing the rates for people like his secretary. What is a fair rate ? A simple flat 10 or 15 % In fact 10% is a very fair number. It is good enough for God, it is more than good enough for the gov’t. Flat tax with no deductions except a certain exemption of income before tax is applied. Throw out the whole complex tax code and it would be a simple sheet of paper.

Taxes should be for revenue, not for social engineering.


4 posted on 01/27/2012 11:33:01 AM PST by CORedneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Hussein and Buffett can criticize and use a lower level employee (whom Buffett could assist financially in any way he likes) as a prop, but when SOMEONE ELSE decides to analyze the fact that she owns two homes and likely makes up to $500,000 a year, well that is (ACCORDING TO HUSSEIN AND BUFFETT APPARENTLY) “ridiculous”, eh?

Got hypocrisy?


5 posted on 01/27/2012 11:36:08 AM PST by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Hey Warren what would you do if Obozo put a 30% tax on all your income regardless of its source? Would you be making investments that entail risk knowing that 30% of whatever you made in capital gains would be taxed at 30% on top of the 33% federal corporate income tax that comes right off the top of a company’s profits? My bet is Buffet would be moving his money offshore in short order.


6 posted on 01/27/2012 11:37:18 AM PST by The Great RJ ("The problem with socialism is that pretty soon you run out of other people's money" M. Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

He isn’t opposed to eliminating loop holes.


7 posted on 01/27/2012 11:37:45 AM PST by fml
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Blowback is a bitch, ain’t it Warren.


10 posted on 01/27/2012 11:53:08 AM PST by headstamp 2 (Time to move forward not to the center.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

My version of the Buffet rule is that all Berkshire Hathaway investors pay the normal 15% capital gains tax, plus a special 65% “secretary tax”.


11 posted on 01/27/2012 11:54:41 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

So, his secretary owns TWO homes, and he wants people to see her as being treated unfairly? I own zero homes, but I’m not complaining that the “Rich” do not pay enough in taxes. The argument isn’t about whether this group or that pays too much or too little. The argument is that the GOVERNMENT squanders what they take in revenue. The argument is that the GOVERNMENT places too many regulations and restrictions upon people who run small or large businesses, stiffling job creation. The argument is that the GOVERNMENT has become too wieldy, attempting to control ALL aspects of EVERYONES lives. The argument is that GOVERNMENT is the problem.


12 posted on 01/27/2012 11:59:44 AM PST by SoldierDad (Proud dad of an Army Soldier who has survived 24 months of Combat deployment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
He's not only a world class rich guy - He's a world class hypocrite.


13 posted on 01/27/2012 12:01:30 PM PST by Iron Munro ("Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight he'll just kill you." John Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
If Buffett wants to shill for Obama’s ugly agenda, he should not be surprised to get some vociferous pushback. Lie down with dogs, etc.
14 posted on 01/27/2012 12:06:53 PM PST by The Electrician ("Government is the only enterprise in the world which expands in size when its failures increase.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Poor dummy, he puts his secretary in the national spotlight and cries when the light is shined on her


16 posted on 01/27/2012 12:25:07 PM PST by italianquaker ( Mr Obama inherited an AAA rating and made it AA, thnx Resident Zero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
less than half Bosanek's 35.8 percent rate

Is that her total tax rate or her marginal tax rate?

If it is her total tax rate and assuming she is married filing jointly with Nebraska income tax and SS+Medicare up to 106,000 and only Medicare above that, I come up with a pay of about $357,000. I ignored deductions and exemptions and any capital gains, even though she should have some. If those were included her income would have to be even higher to get to 35.8% total income and payroll taxes. I also didn't count the employer's half of social security. Either way, she is right about at the bottom edge of the eeeeeeeeeeeeeeevil top 1% of income earners, and I dislike how she is being used as a political bloody shirt comparing the income taxes paid by a 1%-er against a the capital gains of a 0.001%-er.

17 posted on 01/27/2012 1:41:58 PM PST by KarlInOhio (Herman Cain: possibly the escapee most dangerous to the Democrats since Frederick Douglass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Buffett is such a hypocrite. He is currently fighting the IRS in court over taxes owed and he takes only a 100,000 salary. Precisely to minimize his taxes.


19 posted on 01/27/2012 3:23:22 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

She’s rich. I thought the Dems wanted rich people to pay high taxes?


21 posted on 01/27/2012 10:54:47 PM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

This is easily solved, the House Ways and Means Committee needs to hold Hearings on Taxation then ORDER BOTH TO TESTIFY UNDER OATH and Bring their TAX RECORDS for further examination. When it is proven that they BOTH LIED in an effort to defraud the Taxpayers out of more of their hard earned money based on THEIR FRAUDULENT REPRESENTATION of FACT, PUT THEM IN PRISON and Seize their Assets for their CRIMES AGAINST THE PUBLIC. FRAUD. Call these people out, force them to prove their ridiculous statements.


24 posted on 01/29/2012 5:12:43 AM PST by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson