Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Timber Rattler
As Rush and others pointed out, if Nancy Reagan had ever thought that Newt was in any way an opponent of her beloved husband, she would never have even appeared on a stage with him, let alone presented him with an award and said such kind things about him.

This misses the point for me.

I think it's of course ridiculous to claim that Newt Gingrich was "an opponent" of Ronald Reagan.

But the fact is that, typical of Newt, he didn't always exercise the best judgment in how, when, where and in what words he voiced his views.

Recognizing that this man has a history political brain farts is not out-of-bounds. In fact, it is one of the reasons for and results of a robust primary.

Moreover, and also typical of Gingrich, none of this would have had the impact it had had he, himself, not overreached (in practical political terms) by his own characterization of his relationship with President Reagan and Reaganism.

That said, Palin is exactly right that Mittens is in absolutely no position to say Word One about any of this.

I think the world of Sarah Palin, but I have not appreciated her coyness in her support of Newt. She stated the people of South Carolina should vote for Newt "to keep the primary season going," which is not the same as saying "so Newt has a better chance of winning." But at the same time what's happened in terms of opposition to Newt is exactly what was predictable as the primary season "kept going."

I initially thought Palin's seeming strategery was pretty smart. Now I think she was wrong and somewhat dishonest (disingenuous) to not endorse Newt, if that's what she was actually trying to accomplish, rather than simply claiming the goal was "keeping it going and see what happens."

30 posted on 01/27/2012 3:47:37 PM PST by fightinJAG (So many seem to have lost their sense of smell . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: fightinJAG
She cannot endorse - she is under contract with Fox News and is prohibited - by contract - from doing so.

In fact she is quite likely in hot water for for what she has said and posted already - that is 'tantamount' to endorsement.

52 posted on 01/27/2012 4:09:00 PM PST by Ron C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: fightinJAG

Completely disagree...this is pure genius. How long does an endorsement really last? This way she can keep giving the endorsement...and if Newt goes off the deep end she can easily pivot to Santorum.


212 posted on 01/27/2012 6:01:49 PM PST by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: fightinJAG

I think the world of Sarah Palin, but I have not appreciated her coyness in her support of Newt. She stated the people of South Carolina should vote for Newt “to keep the primary season going,” which is not the same as saying “so Newt has a better chance of winning.” But at the same time what’s happened in terms of opposition to Newt is exactly what was predictable as the primary season “kept going.”


I think that Sarah is keeping her options open. Santorum is also in the race and she likes him too as a consistent conservative fighter. It is too early to say how Newt or Rick will end up.


382 posted on 01/28/2012 1:16:10 AM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson