Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12

He was ONLY for Romney when the choice was between McCain & Romney. The kinds of half truths you’re spouting is exactly what this article is all about. The establishment’s trying to do this to Newt as well. But if you really think Rush is establishment stop listening because you’re not any more successful at rewriting history as the RINO establishment.

Cindie


370 posted on 01/28/2012 12:31:05 AM PST by gardencatz (I'm lucky enough to live, walk & breathe among heroes! I am the mother of a US Marine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]


To: gardencatz

Your half truth is in faulting me for pointing out that Rush was a Romney man in 2008, Huckabee and McCain were both in the race when Rush took the unusual step of announcing his feelings for Mitt Romney. This time Newt is in his way, and Rush hit him hard, when it hurt the most.

Did you read post 242, that and Drudge, is why it will always be known as Bloody Thursday.

‘’I think the one candidate of the three still out there on our side that matter... in saying who more closely embodies all three legs of this conservative stool, you’d have to say that it’s Mitt Romney. There’s actually no choice in the matter.’’ (Monday, Feb 4, 2008)
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_020408/content/01125109.guest.html.guest.html

“...national radio talk-show host Rush Limbaugh, who endorsed Romney on Tuesday [February 5, 2008]”
Newsmax - Feb 6, 2008
(archived page — original link expired)


380 posted on 01/28/2012 12:51:33 AM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson