Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fightinJAG

WOW! Are you ever way off on your anaylsis! No wonder why Sarah has been so successful - she sees and says things as they really are!! You need your oil checked BIG TIME.

Mitt has NOTHING to come against Barry with! Even right down to his no accountability, he never saw his ads with HIS endorsement on it, he’s clueless what investments he has in his OWN name. WTF kind of businessman is he? “It’s Bushes fault” all over again. Those excuses he gave to Newt/America will be ripped to shreds by Barry and his handlers. And Mitt won’t be having the media to protect him if, God forbid, that day comes. The reason Newt asked in the first place.

It will be MinceMittMonday - the result of Bloody Thursday.

Clue-the media won’t allow Mitt to be vetted, just like Barry. If you watched the debates - one would have to be blind not see that.

Newt’s record of achievements speak for themselves as Mitt’s lack of them does. He’s running on what he calls a conservative trait of being married for ‘x’ amount of years and produced ‘5’ kids - WOW! This guy is as dumb as a box of rocks. You can’t make this stuff up but Mitt can!

It’s no wonder he’s no visionary - his vision is solely on himself, not America. He’ll use the successes of the visionaries but criticize those who have it. What a con man - what got him on that stage and has kept him there is his lying and backstabbing - his veins are full of evil and not a drop of patriotism.

What we sow, we reap - more than we sow, later than we sow.

I, personally, will not vote/sow for evil. Evil will not thrive on my back/my life.


400 posted on 01/28/2012 5:04:22 AM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies ]


To: presently no screen name

Good grief, *I* never said *I* thought Mittens was the best candidate to beat Obama.

I said that appears to be what is driving a lot of his support. And anyone who thinks simply saying Mittens is rotten for this, that and the other is not going to make any headway **unless** that information can also be used to show that he CANNOT beat Obama.

My whole point on this thread has been to offer up some ideas on how Gingrich can gain support, and how simply hoping and pining for the media to vet Romney is a waste of time (which you, yourself, admitted).

Palin didn’t go far enough. No one **out there** will care what comes out about Romney, no matter how much he is further vetted. If the dirt doesn’t seem to affect his **perceived** electability, — (read that again: that qualifier means that I am about to state a conclusion that is NOT my own, NOR do I think it’s factual, but it IS a perception that is animating a lot of Romney supporters) — voters are just going to shrug it off.

So, I don’t know how many times I have to say this for you, by IMO Newt needs to make everything that comes out of his mouth, including how he debunks unfounded negative attacks, relate back to his ability to defeat Obama.


427 posted on 01/28/2012 9:50:58 AM PST by fightinJAG (So many seem to have lost their sense of smell . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 400 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson