Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pentagon Seeks Mightier Bomb vs. Iran
Wall Street Journal ^

Posted on 01/27/2012 5:14:51 PM PST by Sub-Driver

Pentagon Seeks Mightier Bomb vs. Iran By ADAM ENTOUS And JULIAN E. BARNES

WASHINGTON—Pentagon war planners have concluded that their largest conventional bomb isn't yet capable of destroying Iran's most heavily fortified underground facilities, and are stepping up efforts to make it more powerful, according to U.S. officials briefed on the plan.

The 30,000-pound "bunker-buster" bomb, known as the Massive Ordnance Penetrator, was specifically designed to take out the hardened fortifications built by Iran and North Korea to cloak their nuclear programs.

But initial tests indicated that the bomb, as currently configured, wouldn't be capable of destroying some of Iran's facilities, either because of their depth or because Tehran has added new fortifications to protect them.

Doubts about the MOP's effectiveness prompted the Pentagon this month to secretly submit a request to Congress for funding to enhance the bomb's ability to penetrate deeper into rock, concrete and steel before exploding, the officials said.

The push to boost the power of the MOP is part of stepped-up contingency planning for a possible strike against Iran's nuclear program, say U.S. officials.

The Defense Department has spent about $330 million so far to develop about 20 of the bombs, which are built by Boeing Co. The Pentagon is seeking about $82 million more to make the bomb more effective, according to government officials briefed on the plan.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: globaljihad; iran; jihad; nuclear
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last
Hmmm.......
1 posted on 01/27/2012 5:14:54 PM PST by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

We’ll never know until we actually use it, will we?


2 posted on 01/27/2012 5:16:54 PM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Yeah

I was thinking what one very small nuke would do.


3 posted on 01/27/2012 5:18:38 PM PST by Steve Newton (And the Wolves will learn what we have shown before-We love our sheep we dogs of war. Vaughn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The next step would have to be the EPNM,
the Earth Penetrating Nuclear Munition,
dropped in series to eat their way down
to the facility.

Probably messy but who cares.


4 posted on 01/27/2012 5:22:20 PM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Sometimes conventional ordinance just isn't enough, and it takes one to destroy one.
5 posted on 01/27/2012 5:23:00 PM PST by GenXteacher (He that hath no stomach for this fight, let him depart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
What we need is velocity, not mass. Forget gravity bombs. We need something very hard and rocket propelled.
6 posted on 01/27/2012 5:26:19 PM PST by ryan71 (Dear spell check - No, I will not capitalize the "m" in moslem!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tet68

Just explode a very dirty nuke so all the operators get radiation poisoning every time they go to work the next 100 years. Besides we have plenty of shovel ready nukes in inventory.


7 posted on 01/27/2012 5:27:14 PM PST by pwatson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

You know, it’s probably not necessary to actually “Destroy” a bunker totally if you can convert it to a tomb!

So long as the elevators and tunnels are collapsed by the blast, no one and no material will be getting in or out.

The Idjits might dig them out eventually, but the activity would be visible and easily stopped with conventional bombs.


8 posted on 01/27/2012 5:30:30 PM PST by Loyal Sedition
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ryan71

How about a 1000kg solid Tungsten or Depleted Uranium warhead on an ICBM? I believe tha the impact would be 0.075 Kilotons focuses on a small area.


9 posted on 01/27/2012 5:31:15 PM PST by rmlew ("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pwatson

Too bad we got rid of the B41’s. High yield and dirty.


10 posted on 01/27/2012 5:31:26 PM PST by Fred Hayek (FUBO, the No Talent Pop Star pResident.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Steve Newton

Or a larger one for extended deterence.


11 posted on 01/27/2012 5:37:18 PM PST by himno hero (Obamas theme...Death to America...The crusaders will pay!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Fred Hayek

B53s. Nine megatons yield and you can lay them right down on top by parachute.


12 posted on 01/27/2012 5:39:17 PM PST by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: All

Off Topic...

Note: It is unknown to me if this is correct information or disinformation.

#

presstv.ir/detail/223154.html

“Iran, Iraq ink MoU on transportation”
Thu Jan 26, 2012 10:34AM GMT

SNIPPET: “Iran’s Minister of Roads and Urban Development Ali Nikzad (L) and Iraq’s Minister of Transportation Hadi al-Amiri signed an MoU on transportation.

Iran and Iraq have signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) to increase cooperation in road, railway and air transportations as well as technical and engineering fields.

The MoU was signed by Iran’s Minister of Roads and Urban Development Ali Nikzad and Iraq’s Minister of Transportation Hadi al-Amiri on Wednesday.

Under the MoU, Iran and Iraq agreed to facilitate bus travel and launch more direct flights between the two countries. They also agreed to connect the two countries’ railways through Khosravi and Shalamcheh border lines.

Nikzad also said Iran is ready to cooperate with Iraq in housing projects.”


13 posted on 01/27/2012 5:41:07 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The question is...

Is there a money for a bigger bomb and how long will that take?

#

Off Topic:

defense.gov//News/NewsArticle.aspx?ID=66959

“Odierno: Army Will Become More Capable Through Drawdown”

By Lisa Daniel
American Forces Press Service
WASHINGTON, Jan. 27, 2012

defense.gov//News/NewsArticle.aspx?ID=66960

“Schwartz: Smaller Air Force Will Still be Effective”

By Jim Garamone
American Forces Press Service
WASHINGTON, Jan. 27, 2012


14 posted on 01/27/2012 5:46:37 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

A Look at Iran
http://www.truthusa.com/IRAN.html


15 posted on 01/27/2012 5:47:43 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Why wouldn’t we just try to blow up the elevators down to the bottom. Cut off their O2 and will set them back a few days.


16 posted on 01/27/2012 5:47:48 PM PST by Vermont Lt (I just don't like anything about the President. And I don't think he's a nice guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ryan71

Dropping rods from space would do just fine.


17 posted on 01/27/2012 5:55:25 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: All

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4181664,00.html

“Barak: Iran ‘drifting’ toward nuke goal line

Defense minister tells Davos World Economic Forum international community must curb Tehran’s nuclear ambitions before surgical strike becomes only option”

Associated Press
Published: 01.27.12, 14:28 / Israel News

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4181550,00.html

“Dempsey: US, Israel view Iran threat very differently
US army chief says Washington determined to prevent nuclear Iran, ‘but that doesn’t mean dropping bombs necessarily’”

Yitzhak Benhorin
Published: 01.27.12, 00:08 / Israel News


18 posted on 01/27/2012 5:56:42 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

We do not need one...we need real leadership!


19 posted on 01/27/2012 5:58:53 PM PST by ICE-FLYER (God bless and keep the United States of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Ok, then use 10 of those consecutively in the same spot - they hit it sooner or later.


20 posted on 01/27/2012 5:59:56 PM PST by PMAS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson