[TheLawyerFormerlyKnownAsAl]

Michelle Bachmann on with incontinent Bob. She refuses to comment on Romney’s credibility.

Not what I heard. I heard her refuse to say whether he has integrity when it is clear he has none. I gave money to her last reelection campaign even though I live in an adjoning district. I held back donating to her presidential campaign and do not regret it, nor do I expect to donate to her upcoming reelection campaign. Classy, simplesimon? Not even close. Craven is more like it.

[altura]

As someone who proclaims herself head of the Tea Party, it is incumbent on Bachmann to come out against Romney.

If she won’t do that, she should give up her crown.

[Cboldt]

-- I heard [Bachmann] refuse to say whether [Romney] has integrity when it is clear he has none. --

That's an ambiguous characterization of the exchange. If she's asked about Romney having good character, and refuses to answer, it comes off as her not finding him to have good character. I don't think that's the impression she left. I think she intended to and probably did leave the impression that Romney does not have an integrity issue in this campaign. If she can't say, then she really doesn't have basis to support her assertion to be a TEA Party leader.

If I understand your position, I agree with it - she's self-serving.

[simplesimon]

Classy, simplesimon? Not even close. Craven is more like it.
________________________________________________________

That is my opinion. You’re welcome to your own, which obviously you stated.

Fwiw, I saw her LONE interview, and only caught a glimpse of the “panel” interview later on, as I was walking out the door to go split some firewood .