[BlueMondaySkipper]

Excellet news. Apparently the law requires the full 4 digit year. They showed page after page on the news last night that looked to be invalid. This whole thing might just fail here.

Look for the libtards to go ballistic if that happens.

[Tijeras_Slim]

ping

[Track9]

In all seriousness, there should be a requirement - if more than 10% or 15% are found invalid/fraudulent, the whole thing is thrown out. There has to be some accountability when these obvious fraudsters are ‘collecting’ signatures. This business of piling on oceans of fake people is ridiculous.

[Presbyterian Reporter]

It will be interesting to see if the courts side with the full 4-digit year requirement.

From the news story it appears the 4-digit year requirement will lead them to toss a huge number of petitions.

[sportutegrl]

"You can't just sign 12-1-11. It has to be 12-1-2001," said Magney. "That's one of the requirements in the law, . . .

I doubt any of the signatures are valid at all, then.

[afraidfortherepublic]

Wisconsin Recall Petitions Full of Errors Ping

If you want on, or off, this Wisconsin interest ping list just FReep mail me.

[simplesimon]

DemonRats never follow the Rules/ Law and pi$$ and moan when they get caught but always seem to manage to find some libtard judge who sides with them. GRRRRRRRR

Pray that this is upheld and the law is followed. This could be GR8 that most of the signatures were thrown out and they should be since a Michigan college campus was floating the petition around according to fellow FReeper ( Cripplecreek ???? I think it was that mentioned this )

[STD]

When do I need to leave the warmer climes to go north and vote for Gov. Walker et al? When’s the election recall date?

[subterfuge]

No mention of dead or invalid petitioners? (I guess those aren’t mutually exclusive of one another)

[Oatka]

We found page after page showing the date not fully written out. . . . On other pages the date was abbreviated on every line, which according to Magney would be an error and could disqualify those signatures. So we contacted Magney once again for clarification--asking if what we found would be considered an error.
"Possibly, we'll have to see. But it has to be the full year spelled out," reiterated Magney by phone.

How can it only be "possible" and then turn in the same breath say that the date "has to be" - typical tap dancing by these people.

On some of the pages I worked on, the date was just "11". And . . . you have to wonder at the million + signatures. I saw some pages with only five signatures and one that had a single entry. I half suspect, as a previous poster suggested, that the anti-Walker people figured 10 signatures to a page by x amount of pages turned in and voila! over a "million" signatures.