Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Flycatcher

I think your parsing of DL reads in too much cynicism on his part. I think he genuinely sees Santorum as the true conservative, not Newt. I think he’s rigidly applying the formula that one should support the purest conservative in the primary and then suck it up and support whoever the nominee happens to be in the general. Unfortunately in our present circumstances this could very well help Romney get the nomination. But I don’t think this means he’s starting with a desire to see Romney get it. I just think that’s where his adherence to the formula takes him. I would say that he realizes this on some level, and I would guess that he himself isn’t totally comfortabe with the implications of what he’s written. I think he’s being formulaic and inflexible, maybe even a little bit naive, but not cynical. I don’t think DL is an establishment guy or a cynic, but I think he has managed to wedge himself into a position that can look that way from certain angles.


440 posted on 01/31/2012 4:56:56 PM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies ]


To: Yardstick
I understand your point. David Limbaugh (if we're to believe that he's not being disingenuous) is following what he believes to be the "formula': vote for the most conservative candidate in the primary, then unite around the eventual nominee at the general election.

There's only one small problem with the 2012 bottling of this formula. If Romney is the nominee, then Limbaugh is urging conservatives to rally around a man who is the very antithesis of conservatism. It could very well mean the end of conservative participation in the GOP. I can't speak for others, but if Romney is the nominee, I will not only actively campaign AGAINST him, but burn my Republican Party registration card. Happily.

In short, the "formula" needs to be tossed. Its expiration date has passed. It's poison.

548 posted on 01/31/2012 5:16:26 PM PST by Flycatcher (God speaks to us, through the supernal lightness of birds, in a special type of poetry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 440 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson