Do you listen to laura? did you hear her last week all week long advocating for Newt? That’s all i am saying. you don’t become a shill for Romney overnight, when you were a vociferous advocate for Newt 24/7 yesterday. ANYONE making fun of romney’s looks when there is a newt gingrich in the equation, sounds ridiculous. Both Laura and Ann are lawyers, to think their support is based on looks is just silly.
“Do you listen to laura? did you hear her last week all week long advocating for Newt? That’s all i am saying. you don’t become a shill for Romney overnight, when you were a vociferous advocate for Newt 24/7 yesterday. ANYONE making fun of romney’s looks when there is a newt gingrich in the equation, sounds ridiculous. Both Laura and Ann are lawyers, to think their support is based on looks is just silly.”
Good for her if she was advocating for Newt. But she was thrilled with Santorum when he endorsed Romney in 2008. As for Newt’s looks, he might not be a matinee idol, but neither is that bland-vanilla plastic pod-person with the greasy hair and bloated face who looks like a space alien’s idea of a 50s dad. And as long as women like Coulter and Ingraham perpetuate the falsity of Willard’s “good looks”, I will continue to confront that falsity, because I get sick of the stupidity.
As for Coulter, yes, she’s a lawyer—so what? She’s also proven herself to be a hysterical idiot. She hyperventilates over first Christie and now Willard. She needs a husband.