To: John D
“He may vote against that particular bill, but he pays the dimwits who agree to vote for his earmarks back by voting for other bills they want.”
The problem is, there are a lot more dimwits that refuse to end earmarks altogether than dimwits that put them in the omnibus bill and then vote against the omnibus bill. If you can turn those numbers around you’ll be “accomplishing” something.
55 posted on
02/03/2012 2:37:36 PM PST by
SharpRightTurn
( White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
To: SharpRightTurn
The problem is, there are a lot more dimwits that refuse to end earmarks altogether than dimwits that put them in the omnibus bill and then vote against the omnibus bill.
If the surrender monkey would not reward those who waste money on his earmarks by voting for their waste much more waste would be avoided. Cut and Run rewards those who vote for his waste, by voting for theirs.
58 posted on
02/03/2012 4:27:26 PM PST by
John D
To: SharpRightTurn
The problem is, there are a lot more dimwits that refuse to end earmarks altogether
You mean like Appeasement Paul?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson