Didn’t she take an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution?
Is this grounds for impeachment?
In the liberal worldview, both the oath and the Constitution itself are outdated and subordinate to the intellectual ability of liberal intellectuals alive and making decisions today.
There is no “contradiction” in her mind or in the minds of liberals, that she would take the oath to attain the position to subordinate the very concept she swore an oath to uphold. We’ve got Utopia to form, donchaknow?