Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House gives up more Solyndra docs (only the third time)
The Hill ^ | 2/03/12 | Andrew Restuccia, Ben Geman

Posted on 02/03/2012 10:39:51 PM PST by Libloather

White House gives up more Solyndra docs
By Andrew Restuccia and Ben Geman - 02/03/12 06:45 PM ET

Amid threats by a top House Republican to pursue contempt charges, the White House on Friday sent lawmakers more internal documents related to the $535 million loan guarantee to failed solar firm Solyndra.

The White House, in providing the 313 pages of documents, again denied that approval of the loan guarantee in 2009 was influenced by politics, an allegation that Republicans have repeated for months.

“Notwithstanding the lack of any evidence supporting the Committee’s allegations of favoritism to campaign donors or other alleged improper conduct, the committee continues to engage in a wide-ranging fishing expedition, demanding that the White House provide more documents with minimal, if any, relevance to the Committee’s oversight interests of legislative function,” the White House’s top lawyers wrote in a letter to Republicans Friday.

Friday marked the third time that the White House provided internal documents to the House Energy and Commerce Committee since Republicans on the panel issued a subpoena for all Solyndra communications in November.

In addition to the approximately 1,500 pages of documents that the White House has now provided to Republicans probing the loan guarantee, federal agencies have given lawmakers more than 185,000 pages of documents.

The months-long GOP-led Solyndra investigation has not unearthed evidence that political favoritism was a factor in granting the loan guarantee. But the probe has unearthed several emails that are uncomfortable for the White House, including several that show administration officials raised internal concerns about the wisdom of approving the loan guarantee.

Solyndra filed for bankruptcy in early September shortly after the California-based solar panel maker laid off 1,100 workers. Republicans immediately seized on the company’s collapse, intensifying their ongoing Solyndra investigation.

Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-Fla.), the GOP lawmaker heading up the probe, has alleged that the White House has not been forthcoming with documents in response to the subpoena. He organized a meeting with Republican lawmakers on the committee’s investigative panel Thursday to discuss the possibility of pursuing contempt charges over the White House response to the subpoena.

But Stearns told reporters after the meeting that he has not yet determined whether to move forward with the charges, signaling that the additional White House documents would influence Republicans’ final decision.

The White House said Friday that it has completed a search for all Solyndra documents from Jan. 20, 2009, to Aug. 31, 2011.

The letter to House Republicans says the White House excluded documents that have already been provided to the committee by other federal agencies, emails from media organizations and press releases, among other things.

The White House also said it did not provide “a small number of internal White House documents that contain only incidental references to the Solyndra conditional commitment, but implicate long-standing Executive Branch institutional interests.”

The White House said it is willing to consider providing additional documents, but added, “[I]n light of this production and the minimal yield it demonstrates in terms of information relevant to the Committee’s oversight and legislative functions, we suggest that the Committee reconsider its broad requests.”

The documents include more emails showing Energy Department and White House officials planning for 2009’s two major Solyndra announcements – the preliminary March offer of the loan guarantee and the deal’s completion in September.

The documents show that administration officials were keen to tout Solyndra as a major step in White House efforts to spur clean energy industries and jobs. Solyndra was the first loan guarantee issued under a green energy program that was authorized in a 2005 energy law, and received additional funding in the stimulus law.

In a March 17, 2009 email from the Energy Department to White House officials including Vice President Joe Biden’s then-chief of staff Ron Klain, DOE public affairs director Dan Leistikow notes:

“[W]e will have done in 2 months what hadn’t been done in 4 years – reflecting the Administration’s commitment to moving aggressively with important investments that create jobs and make us energy independent.”

The conditional loan guarantee was announced March 20 of 2009.

The emails also show Klain was optimistic about having Biden and President Obama directly involved in Solyndra. “This is great,” he notes in an August 11 email as the completion of the loan guarantee was nearing. “When is vp next in California? When is potus in California.”

Biden appeared via satellite at the event finalizing the loan guarantee in September of 2009, and Obama personally visited Solyndra in May of 2010.

Stearns signaled Friday that Republicans have no intention of slowing their Solyndra probe. He said he’s planning more hearings and hopes to continue examining the Energy Department’s early 2011 decision to restructure the Solyndra loan as the company faced major financial problems.

The restructuring agreement ensured that private investors who agreed to inject more capitol into Solyndra would be repaid ahead of the taxpayer if the company collapsed.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bankrupt; greenenergy; house; solyndra; white
The White House also said it did not provide “a small number of internal White House documents that contain only incidental references to the Solyndra conditional commitment, but implicate long-standing Executive Branch institutional interests.”

Why not?

1 posted on 02/03/2012 10:40:05 PM PST by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Hey, what happened with the subpoena POSOTUS ignored in the Georgia hearing about his eligibility to be listed on the Georgia ballot?
2 posted on 02/03/2012 10:49:22 PM PST by immadashell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
The White House, in providing the 313 pages of documents, again denied that approval of the loan guarantee in 2009 was influenced by politics

Of course it wasn’t influenced by politics!

It was influenced by campaign cash!

What are those Republicans thinking?!!!

3 posted on 02/04/2012 12:16:01 AM PST by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

“[I]n light of this production and the minimal yield it demonstrates in terms of information relevant to the Committee’s oversight and legislative functions, we suggest that the Committee reconsider its broad requests.”

Translation: Since all we gave you was this little
release it proves we don’t have any more, now leave
us alone.

Most transpearent administration my A**.


4 posted on 02/04/2012 1:14:07 AM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tet68; Libloather
“Notwithstanding the lack of any evidence supporting the Committee’s allegations of favoritism to campaign donors or other alleged improper conduct, the committee continues to engage in a wide-ranging fishing expedition, demanding that the White House provide more documents with minimal, if any, relevance to the Committee’s oversight interests of legislative function,” the White House’s top lawyers wrote in a letter to Republicans Friday.

Either this is a very stupid lawyer when it comes to constitutional law or he is just trying really hard to mislead the public as to what is the ‘oversight’ function of congress.

Oversight, in this case, by congress means that congress is to keep watch on the administrative branch’s spending of congressionally appropriated funds.

Congress by law appropriated loan guarantees for ‘Green’ energy companies. In the law it was stipulated how the funds were to be allocated and what controls were to be in place to ensure that the companies applying for the funds were financially viable. Laws were also in place to ensure that loan repayment to the tax payer would have first priority in the event of bankruptcy.

First of all it is up to Congress to decide what is a proper use of its oversight power and not the administration. Second it certainly is a proper function of the oversight powers of Congress to ensure that federal funds are not used as rewards to campaign contributors especially where those rewards amount to one half of a billion dollars of tax payer’s money.

Second of all considering how long it has taken to produce these documents I can only surmise that these documents have been thoroughly screened to ensure there is no damming evidence to be found in these few pages that have been produced.

5 posted on 02/04/2012 1:37:30 AM PST by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson