Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jonty30; All
Why would Newt concede anything, if he’s willing to fight on? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Newt, in his Press Conference last night, indicated that he had, and will continue, to get just as nasty as Romney. The only alternative, he said, was to “get out of the race”. So, he’s willing to take this thing to the mat with RINO-Rom. That is perfectly alright with me because whomever our nominee is, he goes into the GE damaged goods anyhow. We've given Obozo and the Dems too much campaign fodder to use on either of these guys in the General Election. The GOP has once again pulled defeat from the jaws of victory, and, I don't really give a damn anymore. We may as well have a Marxist Muslim in the White House as a Marxist Mormon. So, let Obozo have four more years to finish destroying the Economy of this nation. We deserve what we get. Sad to say, but, I don't believe either of them can beat Obozo now. We can hope for a Brokered Convention and that a fresh face, like Jim DeMint or Paul Ryan, comes out the nominee, but that's not happening.
14 posted on 02/05/2012 4:27:34 AM PST by no dems (I'm more concerned with America's future than I am Newt's past.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: no dems
but that's not happening

How do you know? If nobody gets a majority of delegates, then anything goes.

16 posted on 02/05/2012 4:37:11 AM PST by Yashcheritsiy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: no dems
We've given Obozo and the Dems too much campaign fodder to use on either of these guys in the General Election.

That is absolute nonsense. Newt hasn't unloaded nearly a fraction of what the Dems will have in store for Mitt. In fact if you add up what the DNC, Was-a-Man Schultz and Axelrod have put out so far in ads and interviews, they've arguably already put together a stronger anti-Mitt campaign than Newt has. They have probably already done a better job outlining the unethical behavior and unjust enrichment that Mitt engaged in at Bain Capital than Newt has. Mitt's attacks on Newt have been so dishonest and inaccurate, that you might be right that the Dems never would have even thought of doing them, but I'm not sure they would imitate them. With 10 times as many people seeing the ads in the general election, I think the Dems would be more afraid that the truth would get out and a backlash would develop against the lies. Certainly the Republicans will have more money to respond in the general election than Newt has now, which would increase that risk. The Dems will have a much harder time attacking Newt in the general election than they would Mitt. There isn't much substance to criticize Newt on since he's been a successful leader for decades. And it's risky to put out lies when your opponent has the money to respond.

68 posted on 02/05/2012 6:45:04 AM PST by JediJones (Newt-er Romney in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson