| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
| Locked on 02/06/2012 7:36:38 AM PST by Admin Moderator, reason: |
Posted on 02/06/2012 6:48:14 AM PST by usalady
When Slutwalkers paraded bare-breasted on the streets of many cities, focusing on unclothed or barely dressed women not inviting rape, they should have been protesting that rape was being under reported because of an archaic definition of sexual assault used by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) that was created over 80 years ago.
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
I’m confused. Are they trying to criminalize rape?
Are they talking about rape, or rape rape?
I'd suggest everyone make sure their vaccinations are up to date before visiting the examiner blog.
Yes, in a perfect world women should be able to dress in the sluttiest outfit they could find and not have to worry about rape. Also, in a perfect world I should be able to walk through the roughest part of the ghetto at night wearing a Rolex and thumbing through a large wad of $100 bills and not have to worry about getting robbed. But unfortunately, we don't live in a perfect world...
“re they talking about rape, or rape rape?”
What they are ‘talking’ is mere LiberalSpeak.
What their goal seems to be is making it possible for nearly anyone to become a criminal if a female gets a case of post-coital blues, AKA ‘Sluts Remorse’, Lawyers Dream Case Syndrome, Prosecutor/Prosecutrix Wet Dream Case Syndrome,ad nauseam.
Stop that!
Common sense is prohibited when discussing rape.
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com
I’d suggest everyone make sure their vaccinations are up to date before visiting the examiner blog.
Pimpin’ fer Big Pharma, again, eh?
;-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.