He didn't donate
Click the Pic
Sign up to donate monthly
A sponsoring FReeper will contribute $10
For each new monthly sign-up
Posted on 02/06/2012 11:03:46 AM PST by Tribune7
Bloomberg.com reported, Feb. 1, that Goldman Sachs Group workers contributed $106,580 to Mitt Romney's presidential bid in the fourth quarter of last year and that Goldie is his largest source of campaign bucks at a half-million total so far.
Goldman Sachs does like to spread its money around. It gave boatloads to Barack Obama and got Timothy Geithner as secretary of the treasury in return, along with a whole lot of bonus people. . . .
In other Goldman Sachs news, its CEO, Lloyd Blankfein, became the first national corporate spokesman for the Human Rights Campaign, a homosexual advocacy group.
Blankfein made this video for them declaring his support for anal-sex marriage.
(Excerpt) Read more at blog.billlawrenceonline.com ...
I tried posting this information from the Bloomberg site and got a may not link message. The gay marriage info is new. Move it where you feel it is most appropriate
After everything Obama has done for them?
Boy, is HE going to be pi$$ed!
After everything Obama has done for them?
Boy, is HE going to be pi$$ed!
More-—Lucifer v. God. You either have the Standards from our Constitution-—set by the words: Natural Rights from God-—laws of nature and nature’s God-—or you adopt Barney Frank’s standards of Right and Wrong.
These bizarre, mentally ill people who equate anal sex with a “right” are part of the group who want no sexual morality allowed in society. This is the slippery slope to the Bohemian Grove morality and John Maynard Keynes type morality where little boys will be passed around for their sex orgies-—much like the world of Sandusky. These people are no better than Sandusky-—it is their worldview-—if anal sex is “good” then nothing is bad.
We are ditching Christian Ethics and adopting Lucifer’s ethics-—the kind Billy Ayers was demanding when his “wife” and he said, “Smash Monogamy”.
Anything to destroy the moral formation and sexual identity of boys which this concept does. It will create confusion in children and destroy normal sexual identity formation since boys will be told they are homosexual when they prefer to be with boys-—as all normal boys will do. This latency period is necessary for mature development where the opposite sex attraction will form at puberty. They want boys for their sex rings and they need to pervert the reality of boys when they are young.
You are 100 percent right
If one had to pick a company consisting of evil incarnate it would be Goldman Sachs.
Goldman also donated to BHO’s campaign already, a higher amount than posted here. They are playing in the operation Chaos strategy the Dems are unleashing on the GOP.
That was just 4Q2011. 3Q was only a little less. It is also proportionally Mittens:Bobo (3:1) in the same manner Goldman supported Bobo over McCrisis. Goldman also hasn't bet wrong in the modern era.
NOTICE THE LANGUAGE THEY USE.
This is from Professor Lackoff “winning with words”
He says use the propaganda of “Marriage is about love”
NOT MARRIAGE IS ONE MAN AND ONE WOMAN.
This idiot is a romney surrogate?!
The homosexual group that sponsored this is pushing marriage is love which is false.
IN THE LAW THERE IS NO LOVE TEST!
There is no legal requirment for love and marriage. Just that you are not close that first cousins (to account for some states) and you are of opposit sexes and you are not legally incompetent.
How many catholic college endowments have to divest now?
I disagree. I think they are covering their bases and would be absolutely delighted with a Romney presidency. We could start a pool as to which Goldie he would pick for his treasury secretary.
This is just another reason to attack marriages.
This anything goes marriages is about allowing anything and any multiple. (see mormon polygamy)
Society rewards the insitution not the individual.
homosexual conduct contributes NOTHING to society.
(even a childless couple supports the institution. Polygamy does not by displacing the balances of society)
[ps what does GS now stand for?]
What we should start pointing out is if civil marriage -- which is the type of marriage they are talking about -- is about love, why are there divorce courts?
I know I am -— that is why I keep posting it over and over.
:-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.