Posted on 02/06/2012 4:32:19 PM PST by Para-Ord.45
Friday, February 3, 2012, for some kind of a bribe or because he was threatened, Georgia Judge Michael Malihi sold out his country and defecated on the constitution of The United States of America.
As an Administrative law judge in the State of Georgia, a case was presented to him to have Barack Obama removed from the ballot to run for President in the State of Georgia.
His actions have set precedence in American law that if a person is charged with a crime, the best defense, is to not show up for court. Law schools may now offer a course in "The Obama Defense".
Three separate legal teams presented evidence and witnesses to show that Obama is not eligible to run for President because he is not a natural born citizen. Obama produced no evidence, no witnesses and both he and his lawyer failed to show up for court in violation of a subpoena to do so.
Forget about what we think, whether he is, or is not a natural born citizen. Opinions don't count. Only evidence and witnesses count. But we're not dealing with rational minds in this case. We never have.
Judge Michael Malihi violated a basic rule of legal interpretation in his ruling. He violated our earliest Supreme Court ruling on how to interpret the Constitution. He ignored evidence. He ignored witnesses. He ignored earlier Supreme Court rulings establishing that the term "natural born citizen" means, one who is born in America to two American citizen parents.
As attorney Leo Donofrio points out on his website: http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com
"...this Court is 'not authorized either to read into or to read out that which would add to or change its meaning.' ...There is no dispute that Obama was born to a non-U.S. citizen father (his father was a British citizen) and U.S. citizen mother. Being born to an alien father, Obama also inherited his father's British citizenship under the British Nationality Act 1948.
All this demonstrates that Obama was not born in the full and complete legal, political, and military allegiance and jurisdiction of the United States. He is therefore not an Article II "natural born Citizen" and cannot be placed on the Georgia primary ballot."
It is impossible to believe, that Judge Michael Malihi, himself, believed, he was following the constitution and legal precedent. He knows he's a crook. He knows he's a liar. He knows, that in his ancestral home country, that unlike America, he would have his head chopped off for what he did.
He ignored the Constitution and at least three US Supreme Court rulings, defining Natural born citizen as one who is born in America to two citizen parents. He ignored the Law of Nations, that the founders of this country used to draft our constitution. He ignored the countless letters, written back and forth by our founders, defining natural born citizen and their reasons for why they would only accept a natural born citizen as their President.
(Excerpt)
It’s clearly established Obama meets the definition of an unnatural born citizen.
Since Congress can only enact legislation pertaining to naturalization, per Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4 (To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization...), how could Congress pass legislation concerning a natural born citizen and then alter that legislation later, as you state, when it was never empowered to do so?
Aren't those "altered requirements" you're talking about merely changes to legislation previously enacted by Congress?
Why did the US government cite Vattel’s chapter 212 in the WKA brief to the US Supreme Court?
Congress DOES have the authority, through Legislation, to alter or change citizenship rules for Natural Born as well as Naturalized Citizens.
James Madison, Father of the Constitution, clearly said so, and I have posted his statement to this thread at least twice, already.
Since Citizenship rules were vague, at best, it was necessary for Congress to define the rules for Naturalization as well as for Natural Born Citizens.
The primary author of the Constitution, James Madison, said that Congress had such power.
That is good enough for me.
The rules to obtain Citizenship at Birth have changed over time. Natural Born Citizen means Citizen at Birth and NOTHING else!
Having said that, beyond a few things like typos and poor word choice I would say it was pretty concise.
I don't think it'll change much, but who knows. I expect the response will be that the things she mentioned would be considered in the review process and that she will be notified later on the conclusion reached.
I'm not a lawyer and have never played one on TV either so your mileage may vary.
I did rather like her asking about how Malihi could use Ankeny when it was never presented.
What does: “YOU WILL NEVER WIN A COURT CASE” mean?
Apology accepted; I can certainly respect verifying the facts.
I have a feeling this could be a repeat of the Judge Land situation. Orly insulting the court in her appeal isn’t a great way to go, but I’m not a lawyer so I’m not sure of the consequences.
Since you've learned to link it shouldn't be too hard for you to provide support for your conclusions.
James Madison says that Congress has such power.
That is good enough for me, as Madison WROTE THE CONSTITUTION!
Madison said the law of nations is a part of our laws...Madison placed Vattel’s Law of nations is the Constitution.
Obama as an unnatural born citizen violates the law of nations and the Constitution.
The Supreme Court in 2004 said Vattel’s Law of Nations has been a part of our law over 200 years.
Daniel Webster said the same and he directly referenced Vattel.
Madison said the law of nations is a part of our laws...Madison placed Vattel’s Law of Nations in the Constitution.
Obama as an unnatural born citizen violates the law of nations and the Constitution.
The Supreme Court in 2004 said Vattel’s Law of Nations has been a part of our law over 200 years.
Daniel Webster said the same and he directly referenced Vattel.
Can you give me a link to the Expatriation Act of 1868?
I have encountered crooked, biased, and prejudiced judges. Not any personal effects but observations in the course of employment. As such I have reason to believe judges can err if not unintentional and/or be crooked by purpose. Today most judges come from the ranks of lawyers and I’m not the only person in the USA who put lawyers at the bottom of the integrity pole.
I'll be interested to see that link also, where man has the authority to change that which God created ... the "natural" increase of any given society.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.