Replies

I’ll read comments from anyone on this. I was also hoping for comments on those more knowledgeable about legal process than I am.

First off, my apologies for earlier. Nobody likes being played the fool and too many folks have done just that with "Internet documents" in the past. I wouldn't put it past somebody to attribute something to any of the lawyers involved that they didn't write.

Having said that, beyond a few things like typos and poor word choice I would say it was pretty concise.
I don't think it'll change much, but who knows. I expect the response will be that the things she mentioned would be considered in the review process and that she will be notified later on the conclusion reached.

I'm not a lawyer and have never played one on TV either so your mileage may vary.

I did rather like her asking about how Malihi could use Ankeny when it was never presented.