Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sukhoi-30mki

I have to think that this decision to initially exclude the British frigate was undertaken at the level of the 5th US Fleet (Bahrain) or possibly by the Commander, Battle Group. The reasons may have been as simple as that of timing — IOW’s “How long do we have to delay while waiting for the HMS Argyl to form up?”

I love criticizing Obama as much as the next guy, but this probably isn’t related to Obama’s loathing of all things Britsh.


14 posted on 02/07/2012 8:33:52 AM PST by Tallguy (It's all 'Fun and Games' until somebody loses an eye!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tallguy
I have to think that this decision to initially exclude the British frigate was undertaken at the level of the 5th US Fleet (Bahrain) or possibly by the Commander, Battle Group. The reasons may have been as simple as that of timing — IOW’s “How long do we have to delay while waiting for the HMS Argyl to form up?”

I agree. Also, the Navy may have decided that one more frigate was not worth sacrificing unity-of-command.

16 posted on 02/07/2012 8:52:12 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (I'd agree with you, but then we would both be wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson