Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Appeals court: Same-sex marriage ban unconstitutional [Calif]
Orange County Register ^ | LISA LEFF

Posted on 02/07/2012 10:24:14 AM PST by South40

SAN FRANCISCO – Supporters and opponents of California's ban on same-sex marriage were anxiously awaiting a federal appeals court decision Tuesday on whether the voter-approved measure violates the civil rights of gay men and lesbians.

A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that considered the question plans to issue its long-awaited opinion 18 months after a trial judge struck down the ban following the first federal trial to examine if same-sex couples have a constitutional right to get married.

The 9th Circuit does not typically give notice of its forthcoming rulings, and its decision to do so Monday reflects the intense interest in the case.

(Excerpt) Read more at ocregister.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: 9thcircuit; 9thcircus; homosexualagenda; lawsuit; ruling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

1 posted on 02/07/2012 10:24:18 AM PST by South40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: South40

We all knew this would be the ruling!


2 posted on 02/07/2012 10:26:33 AM PST by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: South40

So do the homosexuals get to “marry” now, pending the Supreme Court? Or do they have to wait? Anyone know?


3 posted on 02/07/2012 10:28:31 AM PST by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: South40

At what point does America stop kneeling before judges?


4 posted on 02/07/2012 10:28:56 AM PST by DNA.2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: South40

The state constitution is unconstitutional because it bans a form of sham marriage that is banned by a federal law and not addressed in the United States Constitution? Only the 9th Circuit could make that up.


5 posted on 02/07/2012 10:30:24 AM PST by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Persevero

Answering myself:

“Even if the panel upholds the lower court ruling, it could be a while before same-sex couples can resume marrying in the state. Proposition 8 backers plan to appeal to a larger 9th Circuit panel and then to the U.S. Supreme Court if they lose in the intermediate court. Marriages would likely stay on hold while that process plays out.”


6 posted on 02/07/2012 10:30:56 AM PST by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: South40

Surprise surprise. Legislating from the bench. By all means, let’s re-elect Obama so he can seat more activists until we no longer have a need for legislators at all. It’s the coming American way y’all.


7 posted on 02/07/2012 10:33:09 AM PST by conservativebabe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: South40

The same people that want to get rid of the electoral college because it denies the will of the people applaud this decision denying the will of the people.


8 posted on 02/07/2012 10:33:12 AM PST by Grunthor (Mitt Romney and anyone supporting him can go fornicate themselves with a cactus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1
Only the 9th Circuit could make that up.

That's the 9th 'Circus' and they are the most overturned court in the land.

9 posted on 02/07/2012 10:33:19 AM PST by South40 (Mitt is full of Shtt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: South40

Here is a link to the opinion:

http://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Prop-8-9th-CA-ruling-2-7-12.pdf

Amazingly, the Ninth Circuit DID NOT hold that there was a fundamental right for sodomites to “marry”. In fact, the entire panel rejected the sodomites’ argument on that point. The decision is very, very narrow. It applies ONLY to California, not the rest of the States in the Ninth Circuit.

The decision was 2-1, with Reinhardt and his sock puppet voting to invalidate Prop 8 on different grounds that the pervert Homosexual Judge Walker decided.

This was probably designed to shield the case from Supreme Court review.


10 posted on 02/07/2012 10:37:36 AM PST by willamedwardwallace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: South40

Didn’t you know our Constitution was intended to allow men to marry? How foolish of us.

Also our Constitution prevents the people of a state from choosing their own laws.

So facinating because almost every state bans gay marriage. But this one state in which people voted was out of step with the Constitution.

Black is white and white is black, we’re through the looking glass here, people.


11 posted on 02/07/2012 10:37:36 AM PST by Williams (Honey Badger Don't Care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor
The same people that want to get rid of the electoral college because it denies the will of the people applaud this decision denying the will of the people.

Great point. Liberals are hypocrites. Perverted hypocrites.

12 posted on 02/07/2012 10:38:35 AM PST by South40 (Mitt is full of Shtt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: South40

The 9th Circus? Shocked, I say......shocked.


13 posted on 02/07/2012 10:38:35 AM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: South40

Why bother to vote (especially in KA)?

The judges WILL decide for you! Stay home on your couch and watch American Idol.

14 posted on 02/07/2012 10:40:33 AM PST by Jane Long (Soli Deo Gloria!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wbill

Egggs-zactly.

I knew just by looking at the headline this would be the black robed thugs in the 9th Circus again.


15 posted on 02/07/2012 10:43:50 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This mean Liberals and/or Libertarians (Same Thing) NO LIBS.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

I WISH this and many other decisions would make some here stop denying the absolute importance of having a republican president appoint judges through a republican Congress.

I know it won’t, and I know I will hear all about judges Romney appointed in Massachussetts.

So then darn it, nominate Newt or Santorum. But whatever happens we cannot live with democrat judges and a democrat attorney general any longer. Same goes for Sebellius and all the other liberal idiots we are infested with.


16 posted on 02/07/2012 10:44:59 AM PST by Williams (Honey Badger Don't Care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: South40
I'm thinking the USSC will rule gay marriage is legal.

The only way to stop it is a Constitutional Amendment.

17 posted on 02/07/2012 10:52:09 AM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams

Exactly. And, why the heck rePubbies aren’t shouting this out - 24/7 - escapes me. It’s easy to explain...but, our “leaders” aren’t doing one d&%# thing about our now rapid decline : ..(


18 posted on 02/07/2012 10:52:17 AM PST by Jane Long (Soli Deo Gloria!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: South40

Since when do people have the ‘right’ to get marrried? We heteros don’t! It’s not a ‘right’,it’s a choice.


19 posted on 02/07/2012 10:52:34 AM PST by POWERSBOOTHEFAN (Future Meteorologist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DNA.2012
At what point does America stop kneeling before judges?

When do the Judges receive judgement from America?


20 posted on 02/07/2012 10:53:46 AM PST by Liberal Bob (looneyleft.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson