Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/07/2012 10:46:26 AM PST by RobinMasters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: RobinMasters
Ninth Circus. No surprise there. SCOTUS is homo-heavy. Not sure if it's three or 4, but the fix is in.
2 posted on 02/07/2012 10:49:39 AM PST by Missouri gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters

Typical 9th Circus.

Remember when it was supposed to be one person, one vote? Now it’s one judge, one vote; the others don’t count.


3 posted on 02/07/2012 10:52:25 AM PST by Stormdog (A rifle transforms one from subject to Citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters
Isaiah 5:20
Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
4 posted on 02/07/2012 10:52:39 AM PST by SENTINEL (Romney is to Conservatism what Mormonism is to Christianity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters

Why do they even have voting in California anymore?


5 posted on 02/07/2012 10:54:47 AM PST by Telepathic Intruder (The right thing is not always the popular thing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters
This headline and story is misleading and confusing.

The 9th Circuit is a FEDERAL court, not a "California" court.

Furthermore, the California Supreme Court ruled that Prop 8 IS constitutional.

So, the state ruled it constitutional, and the federal courts overruled it.

-PJ

6 posted on 02/07/2012 10:54:53 AM PST by Political Junkie Too (If you can vote for President, then your children can run for President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters

I am sick of abject Judicial activism.

I am sick of liberals extending natural rights, given from God and enumerated in the Constitution, to behavior and ideology to advance their own causes and inclinations...and in an effort to overthrow the constitution to which they swore an oath to faithfully uphold and defend.

The American people, to avoid the hell of chaos and downfall and implosion such trends will inevitably lead to, simply must throw off the political class that has encumbered us and elect American statemen to office who revere and will hold inviolate the fundmanetal moral values upon which this nation and its constitution was founded.

And those are Christian principles and have defined the very reason why America has been so tolerant of so many who have come to these shores. but when those here want that tolerance to extend to the destruction of what has kept the peace, made us free, defined our prosperity and strength as a nation, that we cannot, nay we MUST not tolerate, but fight with every resource at our disposal.

America at the Crossroads of History
http://www.jeffhead.com/crossroads.htm


7 posted on 02/07/2012 10:55:14 AM PST by Jeff Head (Liberty is not free. Never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters

I have actually read the Constitution and the Federalist papers. I don’t remember marriage being discussed. Maybe they’re talking about the equal protection clause. If that is the case then that doesn’t make any sense either. All homosexuals of adult age are allowed to get married with very few exceptions. They cannot presently be married, and they have to marry someone of the opposite sex. We have the exact same privledges.


8 posted on 02/07/2012 10:57:31 AM PST by W1somoveon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters

Newt Gingrich...pick up the white courtesy phone, please...


9 posted on 02/07/2012 11:00:49 AM PST by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters

Can you imagine these twisted, diseased judges arguing their case before G-d Almighty?


10 posted on 02/07/2012 11:04:44 AM PST by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters
“Proposition 8 served no purpose, and had no effect, other than to lessen the status and human dignity of gays and lesbians in California,”

What a simplistic, reductio ad absurdum rebuttal. Is the institution of marriage nothing more than an attempt to elevate or increase the status and human dignity of heterosexuals? Or is it much, much more -- namely a cornerstone of our civilization that has been extant in some form for all of recorded history?

Much more rests on the institution of marriage than mere social status or some vague sense of "dignity." If this is the level of logic this court develops in its opinions, it is less a court than a court jester.

11 posted on 02/07/2012 11:06:31 AM PST by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters

This decision was already in the word processor two years ago. They just needed proof of the money transfer.


14 posted on 02/07/2012 11:10:49 AM PST by DPMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters

“Calif. court declares Prop 8 unconstitutional”

This is the case that will end up in the Supreme Court.

It will be all up to Anthony Kennedy…

No way to predict the final outcome as of yet...

This may end up to become the “Roe v. Wade” of homosexuality.


15 posted on 02/07/2012 11:16:43 AM PST by Road Glide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters

They’ll never let the People have a say. It’s time for the People start ignoring these elites and their armed dogs.


16 posted on 02/07/2012 11:29:29 AM PST by Clock King (Ellisworth Toohey was right: My head's gonna explode.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters

We have long ceased to be a nation whose foundation is based on Judeo-Christian principles.

One can’t think of anything deviant that will not be acceptable by the Court.


17 posted on 02/07/2012 11:29:29 AM PST by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters

Ninth Circus, most overturned court in the U.S.


18 posted on 02/07/2012 11:33:52 AM PST by JimRed (Excising a cancer before it kills us waters the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters
the 2008 ballot measure that limited marriage to one man and one woman, violated the U.S. Constitution.

Is this how the ballot measure read ? If so, does that mean there is now no limit ?
20 posted on 02/07/2012 12:09:19 PM PST by stylin19a (time to Obamanos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters

I look at this measure as a way to authorize 5 wives by the back door.


21 posted on 02/07/2012 12:11:17 PM PST by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters

This is a bit off-topic, but I recall decades ago that the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals was grossly understaffed based on its allotted number of jurists.

At that time, the hypothesis was broached that the Ninth Circuit sought to keep its numbers small so they could continue to hand down inane decisions similar to the one highlighted in this post.

I noticed the Court ruled 2 to 1. Does anyone know how many justices are currently on the 9th Circuit and how many justices should be seated on that court to place the court at full strength?

By the way, I got over being astonished, surprized, disgusted etc. by 9th Circuit rulings many years ago. The lunacy of the justices is transparent.

EODGUY


28 posted on 02/07/2012 1:50:59 PM PST by EODGUY (Hold on to your copies of the Consititution of the United States. It is going to be re-written.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters

Round them all up!


29 posted on 02/07/2012 1:51:24 PM PST by Friendofgeorge (SARAH PALIN 2012 OR FLIPPIN BUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters
They're 'partying' on Folsom Street.
30 posted on 02/07/2012 2:10:24 PM PST by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson