It would have been Newt 36 - Sanctimonium 19... [with Newt on the ballot]
Based on some mythical calculation.
That is laughable.
Actually, my assertion, by explanation, was: it’s easy to win when you’re not running against anyone else competing for the same voters.
But all 4 candidates were on the ballot in MN and CO and Santorum won there as well, and while Newt wasn't on the ballot in Missouri to take his 15%, Santorum dominated the voting by a huge margin. Except in your mind.
Not only are you deficient as a mind-reader, you seem to have a reading comprehension problem, because I also said, in that same post you quoted from, this:
"CO and MN - true Sanctimonium wins, and props on those! Anybody who beats Willard Your Worst Nightmare - in any way - gets applause from me..."
You Sanctimonium supporters seem to have a real problem with when it comes to telling the truth about, and misquoting, others. But, I guess when your candidate is called by God, as Tricy Ricky stated a few days, those human conventions like honesty can be dispensed with...
Man, that was just an outright lie - totally taken out of context - and conveying a meaning about me that was patently false... sound familiar? learn to defend your candidate without lying about others in the process...