Please don't misinterpret my words, I said:
"Using the past election totals in the other states - I have - as clearly as I could with what I considered reliable figures..."
It would have been Newt 36 - Sanctimonium 19...
I was commenting on 1 race, MO, based on past election totals, and applied some valid math to it, which you snarkily called, mythical - and applying those parameters to what Newt's win would have been in MO...
Nobody knows if CO and MN are flukes, real game changers, or just the usual shift, that remains to be seen. The past results are already in the fabric of this race...
The CO and MN results were clearly available, and I actually congratulated Sanctimonium on them, which you conveniently forgot to post.
You know, Sanctimonium supporters are just as duplicitous, rigid, and humorless as he is... People like you, and your candidate, with your dishonesty, judgmental holier-than-thou attitudes, are not going to be very well received in the general by normal human beings. But keep chugging away...
I congratulated you, I postulated some math, which I happen to be fairly good at, which you snarkily called mythical... and you quoted me out of context - Just another day with the Sanctimonium campaign... not gonna work. Not gonna work. People recognize true love and humility... even when they aren't Christians.
Yes, you're right, that is where I started laughing.
I postulated some math, which I happen to be fairly good at, which you snarkily called mythical...
Yup, that too... I'd love to see you post your calculations.