[Bruce Campbells Chin]

You make a good point about Santorum's past support of Romney. Unfortunately, all three of these guys stink as candidates. That's the reality, which is why all of these threads are more full of negative comments than positive ones.

Santorum is a sanctimonious, dogmatic lightweight, Newt is a nutbag, and Romney is a slimy gameshow host. I hate to say it, but that's how I see it.

But all three are so much superior to Obama that it isn't funny. The one fortunate truth is that the tea party/conservative/anti-ObamaCare sentiment is so strong within the GOP right now that any GOP nominee would have to sing that tune after the election, or be completely abandoned by his own party and guarantee lame-duck status in his first term.

I don't like any of them, but any of them will get my vote in November.

[altura]

I hear you! And I agree with you. I like Newt but I also fear his tendency to get loopy at times. I like him better than I like Santorum.

But who did we start out with?

With Obama hanging like an overripe fruit, we chose to send out the lame and the halt to vie for the nomination.

Huntsman?
Cain double ??
Bachmann - viable until she turned hysterical
Paul - oh, well, you know
Romney - needs another toy - might be fun to be president.
Newt - might as well
Santorum - might as well, can’t get another decent job
Perry- excellent man but negative lies and early debate flops took him down.

So we’re down to three. I will vote for who among them wins and I have zero respect for all the self righteous nuts around here who will vote for zero because they don’t like one of them.