Beyond you being a Catholic hater, can you point to any tangible evidence of this "bottom feeding" that Santorum is involved in? Maybe contrast that with your candidate.
You really don’t have much to offer. “Catholic Hater”? I’ve promoted guys like Michael Voris a great deal in my time. I merely stated in response to some Santorumbot proclaiming “Who can stand against God?” that I’m not a Catholic, so his Catholicism “I’m a Holy Christian” pitch is utterly nullified. Your dishonesty is as bad as Santorum’s.
The bottom feeding is in Santorum’s constant distortion and attacks on other conservatives since the Cain days. For example, his distortion of 999 for the sake of political points, or even taking the time to call Newt “crass”, irresponsible, pandering, and big government due to his Moon Colony statement.
It was this stuff that I noticed back when Cain suddenly started surging. Since I was supporting Cain, I noticed right away how Santorum and a few of the others did their best to distort and mock Cain’s platform.
Mind you, Bachmann was guilty of this too. She even did it against Santorum, talking about his endorsement of Arlen Specter as if he had betrayed his pro-life credentials. (Nowadays, the Santorum folks like to use a similar attack on Newt Gingrich!)
The lack of objectivity and honesty in this campaign has been stunning, and I cite Santorum as being one of the people who have engaged in it heartily. It is for THAT reason, and not for any of his platforms, that I developed my dislike for him. I dislike anyone who is willing to throw former collegues under the Bus just for the sake of power. I dislike anyone who can’t look at a good idea, or any idea for that matter (good or bad), and knee-jerk insult it and distort it into something it is not. It is dishonest, or it is desperation, or it is something that completely blinds the individual from being able to think clearly about the world. That isn’t what I want for a President.
The great thing about Newt is that he is indeed a megalomaniac with his vision to change the world, to lead the conservative reformation of society, which he writes on little sticky notes just for fun. I find it far superior to have a guy who has grandiose visions FOR THE COUNTRY, as opposed to having grandiose visions for his own personal benefit.
Of course, none of this will mean a thing to you, as you are more than happy to trash conservatives who disagree with this yourself!