Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Keystone Calamity
Sun News ^ | January 18, 2012 | Video

Posted on 02/10/2012 6:44:22 AM PST by LucianOfSamasota

Video

(Excerpt) Read more at sunnewsnetwork.ca ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: commanderinthief; smartestpresident
Obama chooses to side with America's enemies over her friends. Again.
1 posted on 02/10/2012 6:44:31 AM PST by LucianOfSamasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LucianOfSamasota

Instead of building a pipline to houston why not build a refinery complex in North Dakota?


2 posted on 02/10/2012 8:32:05 AM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraceG
Instead of building a pipeline to Houston why not build a refinery complex in North Dakota?

Good question, which I have asked myself! Off the top of my head, I can think of several answers.

1. It would take considerable time to get the permits to build and build a huge refinery in North Dakota.
2. The Canadian and Bakken region oil will largely replace foreign imported oil brought in by tankers to the existing refineries on the Gulf Coast; refineries with adequate capacity to handle the oil and an existing distribution system in place.

There may be other reasons.
3 posted on 02/10/2012 10:25:46 AM PST by Hiddigeigei ("Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish," said Dionysus - Euripides)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

Grace,

The proposed project contemplated capital expenditures of several billion dollars. My understanding is that the intention is to transport oil mined from Canadian oil sands to existing refineries on the Texas Gulf Coast. I think transportation of Bakken/Three Forks oil from North Dakota/Montana is also in the mix?

I don’t know how much it costs to develop new refineries and associated infrastructure (rail links, highways, navigable waterways, skilled workforce, etc.) or whether the EPA would even allow a new refinery (I’ve heard one cannot obtain a license). But I am certain that the folks spending $2 billion US are pursuing what they believe to be the most feasible approach.

If you know otherwise, I’d be delighted to hear.


4 posted on 02/10/2012 1:16:23 PM PST by LucianOfSamasota (Tanstaafl - its not just for breakfast anymore...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson