I'm not talking about the FACT that Newt is compromised due to his OWN actions; I'm talking about the double standard when these issues go public.
In the case of Klintoon, there was NO OUTRAGE on the Lib side, no finger-pointing and chastising, and he had sex with a subordinate on MY DIME, then LIED ABOUT IT (waving his finger at me), and was NOT PROSECUTED FOR PERJURY.
Whereas, notwithstanding the illegal phone intercepted call that was SOLD TO THE MEDIA to bring Gingrich to an Ethics Complaint, which is TRUMPETED IN THE STATE-RUN-MEDIA, the Arkancides, Juanita Broderick, Katy Mahoney, Kathleen Willey, Jennifer Flowers, etc., etc., were all NO REASON TO ATTACK Klintoon, in the eyes of the Left.
The double standard is my complaint, and I don't condone the activities of Gingrich, either.
Thanks for the clarification. I agree that they didn’t attack Clinton as much as they did to Newt. While it indeed shows their double standard, I must say part of it is what the men represent, respectively. Newt supposedly represents social conservatism, so it’s not surprising that he was attacked viciously on that area for his actions. To be fair, some of the liberals, like feminist Naomi Wolf, saw what Clinton did. My tag line below is a a play of what she said regarding Clinton.