Breitbart tells CPAC: I have videos of Obama in college and they’ll come out during the election

Hot Air ^ | February 10, 2012 | ALLAHPUNDIT

[Las Vegas Dave]

Thanks for posting...

[C. Edmund Wright]

With due respect, your comment about Breitbart was out of order. He has the credibility to say something like that and be given the benefit of the doubt.

This is the guy behind the effort to out ACORN and Anthony Weiner and much of the Van Jones stuff that Beck took credit for.

If he can line his pockets along the way, so what?

[Finny]

Yep -- and if Breitbart released it too soon, the Dems could switch their candidate nomination. Instead of Obama, it could be Hillary -- or someone relatively obscure and unknown to come out of the blue, as Obama did. Then again, if Newt gets the nomination and goes up against Hillary, why, debates would be Pay Per View! If Santorum or God Forbid Romney got the nod and faced Hillary, she'd flatten them and they'd be saying "Thank you, m'am."

Godspeed Newt Gingrich.

[vanilla swirl]

What’s chilling is that many who voted for Obama would do it again if he murdered Moochelle on the White Hut lawn.

And even more so, there are many who will vote for him BECAUSE of his Marxism.

[9YearLurker]

Agreed, but I don’t think he should have even mentioned it now. Just get some copies into trustworthy hands for safe keeeping.

[Daffynition]

>Quit the tease Breitbart, which is only intended to line your pockets.<

Heh.

Andy makes Drudge look like yesterday's dishwater.

[Axelsrd]

“Southcide” Chicago, that is.

[trebb]

I like the psy-warfare aspect of the announcement - will keep Obama and his minions so puckered up they won’t poop for a month. Then, let’s hope it’s true and he releases it at the right time; early enough for opponents to bury him and late enough it doesn’t become passe’ and lose it’s effectiveness.

[Broker]

Correct. We flail over this miscreant criminal Marxist oblivious of his base.. he has empowered them with his misappropriation of $ trillions.

[arasina]

I wonder if big media, having heard this, will scramble to try to uncover the footage and put it out ASAP so that it’s old news by the time of the general election.

I guess they can't get "The Donald" to do it for them this time like he did with the birth certificate.

[Condor51]

>"What’s O’s version of “Arkancide?”"

*** ... there's the old Chicago gang style. ***

Nah, that way's out now.
Car trunks are too small. :-)

The early 70's to mid 80's were wild times though. About once a month a car in a remote parking lot at O'Hare airport would be found with a body or two in it.

Or they'd just come into a restaurant at lunch with shotguns and whack you like they did with Richard Cain, at 'Rose's Sandwich Shop' on Grand Ave. (Rose's never opened up after that. And that sucked as they had great Italian Sub's (aka: a Poor Boy) & Egg Sandwich's during Lent)

[Flotsam_Jetsome]

bfl. Thanks, Robin.

[southphilly]

We do, if you have a brain and think of a lame duck Obama for 4 years.

The Supreme court. maybe 2 or 3 seats.

[Altura Ct.]

Well good for him but there is not a single candidate who will go after Obama on any this.

The GOP is weak.

[Mountain Mary]

“If I could just attend a dinner party with Andrew Breitbart sitting at my left and Mark Steyn on my right, I would be a happy, happy girl.”

Mark Levin on my right and Rush Limbaugh on my left.

[bestintxas]

Love the irony of the Greek Columns behind Andrew

[newheart]

My Most Esteemed FRiends,

I have nothing against Breitbart lining his pockets and I like the guy (though I admit my post probably didn’t sound like it). He is a hero for his work. And yes he usually has a pretty good sense of when and how to release things like this.

But the ACORN stuff, Van Jones, and Weiner stuff was not teased out over 6-9 months. What concerns me is that this sounds like a very big punch. And you don’t telegraph a big punch. And he has not telegraphed it over a week or two or three to raise interest. Instead he has set up a situation where it can be either released by someone else or it can be almost completely defused by drips and drabs and rewritten by the Axelrod Ministry of Truth in that period of time.

IMHO it would be better to simply put it out now and let it become part of the ads that the primary candidates are running right now. They are spending huge money, some of which won’t be around after the nominee is chosen. Besides, if this thing really shows Obama and his pals out to be the true radicals we believe them to be, even a few Democrats will have to concede our case. Harry Reid will have to stop protecting the guy by creating roadblocks in the Senate. And who knows, maybe even some of Obama’s hagiographers in the press will stop turning a blind eye to the destruction he is intent on.

Then again, perhaps it is not the “Fat Man” we all hope it is.

[C. Edmund Wright]

Ok, fair enough - so I will make two points in response.

A: your first post was not well reasoned and thought out - it was drive by snarky and accusatory in tone EVEN IF you didn’t intend it to be so.

B: second, we’re going to have to trust that Breitbart has a better sense of timing than you do on this.

[Lakeshark]

I had the good pleasure of watching him speak to a small crowd some weeks ago, and had a nice (short) conversation with him before he left.

He's got a great vision and understanding of what is going on right now, and is a fun, very capable warrior for our side.

I would not underestimate him, he's hit more home runs than most.

[NELSON111]

Yeah THAT’S smart. Give the enemy MSM time to down play it...dismiss it...respond TO it and minimize the damage. Glad YOU’RE not running any campaign.