Mark Levin has said over and over that IF he could vote in Virginia for his candidate (he can’t because the Republicans in VA played the game) that he’d vote for Santorum or Bachmann. He has been adamant about that. His reasoning is that he “likes the way they think” and “doesn’t have to practice to define conservatism; he just says what is in his heart). Levin worked for Reagan. Any such endorsement is fine with me.
Santorum/West would be a fine ticket indeed... Any other ticket (including Palin) would be awesome as well.
PS The Mandate issue with Obama against the Catholic Bishops has framed the major debate and Santorum hit it out of the park. Do you really want the government intruding so fully into your life at every moment of your existence? That is where this election is headed. And many religious figures of all persuasions are siding with Santorum.
It is not fine by me. Bachmann had some good views on the economy. Santorum has ZERO interest in the economy and had no views on it. He is a one-trick pony, the sole trick being his ability to make the right sound bites on abortion.
No matter what Mark Levin says, Rick Santorum is a fiscal socialist. If Mark Levin says otherwise, he too needs to be scrutinized. Not every single person who worked in the Reagan administration automatically becomes a conservative in the strictest sense. Mark Levin at that time was merely a paid employee at a junior level. Let us not use hyperboles to make the case.
Santorum is a fiscal socialist.