Of course it’s possible but there is nothing about this caper, at least as it’s been reported to date, that leads me to believe that it is the case in this instance.
Question: Is it not possible for law enforcement agencies to deceive or twist a version of events to fit, in order to avoid career damage/criminal penalties and or extremely costly litigation?
Well?
Of course it’s possible but there is nothing about this caper, at least as it’s been reported to date, that leads me to believe that it is the case in this instance.
You see no issues here?
Oh boy....
This is a really naive statement or one which is very biased.
OCSD has finally admitted the Marine was *not* armed.
OCSD admitted, the Marine drove his own kids to the school.
OCSD said the deputy feared for his life.
OCSD now states the deputy feared for the kids lives.
OCSD admitted shooting to death an unarmed Marine from the driver side window, simply based on the deputy's comment, "The marine was acting or said something irrational and could not let the driver leave with the kids", the same kids he just drove to their school.
OCSD never once alleged the Marine was attempting to run over the deputy, as it's seems substantiated by the blown out driver side window.
Based on what is known, if you're in law enforcement and fail to see some disturbing facts here, I would find a different career.