“Perhaps we should just give CA back to Mexico then militarize the border to prevent the cancer from spreading.”
Within 10 years, “we” are not going to be in a position to “give” anything.
Quite the contrary, California is going to go its own way as a part of “emerging Atzlan”.
This doesn’t bode well for Arizona and New Mexico, either. Consider that NM has already gone “minority-majority”. That is to say, “Anglos” are now a -minority- in New Mexico.
There is no way around the mathematics of this. Demography is destiny.
Remember Ann Lander’s “question” to women:
“Would you be better off with him, or withOUT him?”
Conservatives should start seriously considering the question:
“Would a traditional America be better off with California, or withOUT it?”
I’m willing to bet it will be a hispanic California that finally closes the border with Mexico. Why, you ask? The Mexican border with central America is far more militarized than the American border with Mexico. Troops kill people down there.
Hopefully one day the hispanic government in California gets sick of the Mexicans. It would be ironic.
California never was part of Mexico in any real sense. It was part of the Spanish Empire, then the Mexican Revolution occurred, during which it was really not controlled by anyone but the locals, then they became part of the U.S.
For more on this, see Travis McGee’s “The True History of the Southwest, 101” at the bottom of my FR profile page.