[Ciexyz]

There should be a zero tolerance policy against any contact between an accused child molestor and young people. The safety of the children should trump the 'rights' of the accused. Wait until he's found innocent before allowing an accused molester access.

[from occupied ga]

...an accused child molestor...safety of the children should trump the 'rights' of the accused.

J'accuse Ciexyz de sympathies royalistes. Qu'on lui coupe la tête

[ml/nj]

The safety of the children should trump the 'rights' of the accused. Wait until he's found innocent before allowing an accused molester access.

Oooooh. Let's do it for "the children."

We have much more to fear from the access the Obamas are given to "the children" than whatever access Sandusky is allowed. People know who Sandusky is and if they want to keep their children away from him they will.

And we don't find anyone innocent in a criminal trial. We find them "not guilty." There's a difference.

ML/NJ

[Notary Sojac]

The safety of the children should trump the 'rights' of the accused.

This would be fine, if only the Fifth Amendment had been written as follows:

nor shall any person ..... be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law, except accused child molesters.