[Da Coyote]

Good. Let’s make it mandatory that only affirmative action pilots control the Obamaloon and friend’s planes, only affirmative action doctors service congresscritter’s “Cadillac” health plans, and only affirmative action engineers design electronics and software that liberals use.

Heh!

[cloudmountain]

Sigh, here we go again: some minorities whining about race again.

[GeronL]

So basically a leftist judge gets to decide if it is illegal to NOT descriminate against white people.

[max americana]

“Attorneys for the plaintiffs said affirmative action is needed to increase racial diversity at the University of California’s most prestigious campuses and professional schools. “

groan..If you have the money for tuition and the grades, race is the last thing on the admission rep’s mind. I went to meet a friend of mine at UCLA 2 weeks back, and I rarely saw a white guy.

[Abathar]

Friend of mine went to med school up at Michigan State years ago. When he did his internship he was very outspoken about what he encountered there, I was shocked how blunt he said what he said considering the guy was quite liberal then.

He told me that if I ever was taken to a hospital in East Lansing and a black intern was seeing me I should refuse him and demand another. He said no matter how bad they were they only removed one student that was doing so poor it would have been criminal to allow her to practice medicine, just a CYA move.

Knowing him my whole life a statement like that coming from him just blew me away, he was sickened by the separate standards that white and asian students had to meet compared to their black counterparts, all based on political correctness, and that was almost 25 years ago.

[Buckeye McFrog]

Stare Decisis only applies when Conservatives are trying to change the law, it seems

[Lady Lucky]

It’s time for a change. I’m thinking maybe to self-identify as a person of color. I could go Amish, though. Or Native American.

[AuH2ORepublican]

“”What you see before you is a new form of separate and unequal going on right before our eyes,” plaintiffs’ attorney George Washington told the three male justices.”

---

Thank God the author let us know that all three judges are male. But were any of them left-handed or lactose intolerant? Because that’s really vital information.

[AlanGreenSpam]

What people don’t realize is that policies like Affirmative Action are “State Sanctioned Racism” — which is far, far worse than arbitrary/voluntary racism by individuals because there is an element of fascism in it (e.g. the gov’t forces it on people).

These greedy racists want the State to discriminate for them and against others.

How dumb are these people anyway? Can’t they see their blatant hypocrisy (e.g. “Let’s use racism to end racism!”).

[Tzimisce]

So not discriminating by race is racist discrimination??????????

Just another day in Obamaland. :)

[AlanGreenSpam]

A letter to Attorney Kasarda who is defending Prop 209 (fighting against the neo-racists).

___________________

Hello Mr. Kasarda,

I’m so glad you’re taking the case to defend Prop 209 as most color-blind individuals understand that Prop 209 is as Constitutional as it gets...

As a Chinese-American, I have witnessed racial discrimination at UC Berkeley admissions. (Reference Dinesh D’Souza’s “Illiberal Education” book as a fantastic expose of the folly of so-called “Affirmative Action”).

http://dineshdsouza.com/books/illiberal-jacket.html

Apparently there were too many highly-qualified Chinese applicants to UCB, so the administration set out to discriminate against Chinese via affirmative action programs in the pre-Prop-209 era.

What people don’t realize is that policies like Affirmative Action are “State Sanctioned Racism” — which is far, far worse than arbitrary/voluntary racism by individuals because there is an element of fascism in it (e.g. the gov’t forces people to make racist decisions).

I never hear the argument posed this way (that it’s State Sanctioned Racism).

These greedy racists want the State to discriminate for them by discriminating against other people with different skin color.

Can’t the affirmative action proponents see their blatant hypocrisy (e.g. “Let’s use racism to end racism!”)?

Anyone who preaches against racism should have consistent principles and not use racism as a tool to benefit groups of people with certain skin colors.

Affirmative Action is in DIRECT CONFLICT with the “Equal protection under the law” clause of the Constitution.

Why is this so difficult to understand?

Please use any of the foregoing sentences in your case proceedings.

Thank you for your time,

[rottndog]

Attorneys for the plaintiffs said affirmative action is needed to increase racial diversity at the University of California's most prestigious campuses and professional schools.

They are arguing for the right to discriminate FOR some on the basis of race. It is not possible to do this without discriminating AGAINST others on the basis of race.

[takenoprisoner]

It’s time for AA to expire. It’s a discriminatory practice, based on a presumptuous model, that blacks are incapable of, and inferior to, others. Nothing could be further from the truth. Black Americans, like any other Americans, can compete with the best there is. So yes, let’s end this discriminatory process which deludes their accomplishments.

I can’t imagine any black American who wishes to be known for their success as an AA candidate. How humiliating that must be?

[nerdwithagun]

Racial diversity is NOTHING unless it happens organically. If these people can't meet standards of the job or college application, they need to look internally not externally