Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: katiedidit1
What is discouraging is the apparent lack of critical reading skills from posters on FR these days.

“No one is safe. No one is safe from asymmetric threats of terrorism.”

Not untrue in the least.

Santorum pointed to Iran as the source behind future terrorist attacks, ramping up his rhetoric on a country he frequently discusses on the campaign trail.

Again, not untrue in the least despite CNN trying to portray Santorum as a rhetoric-spewing extremist against poor, old little harmless Iran.

“That’s what Iran will be all about unless we stop them from getting that nuclear weapon,” Santorum said.

Nothing untrue about this either.

Rick Santorum warned a quiet North Dakota audience Wednesday that their state’s booming oil industry positioned the region as a prime target for terrorism.

Over to top?? Maybe, or maybe not. If the first three statements are accepted as true, who is to say that important infrastructure in N. Dakota is immune from a terror attack?

CNN is part of the regime's media and FReepers who post here used to be able to discern a deceptive headline. As for NRO they have in the Romney camp for months.

131 posted on 02/17/2012 1:38:54 PM PST by prairiebreeze (Who are you and what have you done with Ann Coulter?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: prairiebreeze

Great Post. It captures what I’ve been thinking and noticing for some time now.


132 posted on 02/17/2012 2:35:52 PM PST by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson