You are using circular logic that just doesn’t cut it.
It would be the same if I gave a bum $10 and stipulated that he buy food and not booze with it.
So it’s best to let the bum starve in streets than to make the attempt to help because he may use it to get drunk?
If that’s true, then no drunk or drug addict would ever receive the help they need.
“It very well could be put around Newt, because of the good intentions bad result aspect.”
Nope. Intent is everything and the underlying reason to give in the first place.
Otherwise, what would be the reason to try to help anyone at all.
Darn... slow internet...