Skip to comments.
Federal Judge Puts Internet Pioneer in Civil Lockdown
Washington Examiner ^
| February 15, 2012
| Barbara F. Hollingsworth
Posted on 02/18/2012 8:30:32 AM PST by Justice21
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
To: Justice21; EDINVA
The Fifth Circuit has reviewed every order — because Baron appealed every order — and affirmed the judge’s actions. The bankruptcy judge found that Jeffrey Baron was guilty of theft of services and that the bankruptcy was a sham to avoid contempt proceedings in the District Court. Mr. Baron has had every remedial process available to him. The most pathetic part was that he tried to buy peace through a settlement agreement. Yes, he signed it, but he never would execute it. He wouldn’t turn over the domain names he stole. That’s why the case is in federal court. The plaintiffs had to sue him to enforce the settlement agreement. And he still hasn’t executed the settlement. He has fought every step of the way.
21
posted on
02/18/2012 11:31:44 PM PST
by
BuckeyeTexan
(Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
To: Justice21
P.S. You haven’t seen/read all the court files because that blog you linked didn’t post all of them.
22
posted on
02/18/2012 11:35:14 PM PST
by
BuckeyeTexan
(Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
To: G Larry
This is America 2.0...thank the progressives! There is nothing we personally own anymore not even ourselves!!!
America is turning into hell!
23
posted on
02/18/2012 11:35:41 PM PST
by
surfer
(To err is human, to really foul things up takes a Democrat, don't expect the GOP to have the answer!)
To: Justice21
Can anyone explain what “$0.02 cents” is? No, it’s not a typo.
24
posted on
02/19/2012 12:05:18 AM PST
by
Strider2
To: BuckeyeTexan
BuckeyeTexan, you are wrong on everything you've said in your post. There are something like 1000 court filings in this case. If you start to read more of them, it becomes clear that the accusations against this Internet entrepreneur are a coordinated cover up for "taking" (trying to use a nice word instead of "stealing") $10 million dollars from him. Read the settlement agreement and the docs. Baron did execute and comply with it. He paid all of his lawyers, and so on. The bankruptcy judge is in on the cover-up, having secret, closed-door meetings with the other judge and the people who "took" Baron's money. I found this analysis as well:
Click Here For Article. It's hard for most Americans to believe, but some of our federal judges are indeed corrupt, and two of those judges are involved in this case. Baron has been forbidden from having any paid lawyer even for his appeals, so its impossible for him (or for the dozens of other companies in that seizure order) to have any semblance of a fair result. There is absolutely no due process here, so what a court of appeals court finds is meaningless (you are also wrong about the appeals court affirming the orders...In reading the orders, I know that none have been affirmed yet). You can't have any justice without due process. A corrupt process without due process always results in unjust and false outcomes. This is a principle that every civilized society acknowledges and a principle very important to our founding fathers.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson