Skip to comments.Haaretz: Israelís Anti-Semitic Rag
Posted on 02/19/2012 5:02:22 PM PST by SJackson
Haaretz, Israels left-wing daily, used to be Israels newspaper of record and comparable to the New York Times, read also by those who differed from its line. Today Haaretz is read by less than 6 percent of Israelis, overwhelmingly composed of the countrys left-wing elite. Haaretz comes in far behind successful newcomer, right-of-center Israel Hayom at 38% and left-of-center Yediot Aharonot at 36%.
Haaretzs English website, however, gets a very high Alexa rankingaround the 3900th most popular website in the world and currently neck-and-neck with the centrist Jerusalem Posts site. Indeed, Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu allegedly called (his office later denied it) Haaretz and the New York Times Israels two main enemies and said:
They set the agenda for an anti-Israel campaign all over the world. Journalists read them every morning and base their news stories on what they read in the New York Times and Haaretz.
Whether or not Netanyahu said it, he could have added that foreign diplomats as well base their views of Israel, and their perceptionshowever skewedof Israeli opinion, on what they read in Haaretz.
For his part, Israeli justice minister Yaakov Neeman has allegedly gone even further and likened Haaretz to Der Stürmer.
Are such charges justified? To get an idea on whether they are, I followed Haaretzs English websites op-eds and editorials through the Israeli workweek of Sunday, January 29 to Friday, February 3. Having done the same experiment eight years ago, I can say right away that Haaretz has, if anything, gotten worse since then. (While its reporting is also biased, the bias is easier to demonstrate in opinion articles.) This despite the fact that last August, Aluf Benn became Haaretzs new editor in chief.
For years Benn was a thoughtful left-of-center columnist for the paper who made valid, if arguable, points. Under his tenure, though, Haaretz has kept publishing the same bevy of radical leftists. It appears inevitable considering that the Schocken family, which has owned the paper since 1937, still holds a dominant 60% stake of Haaretz. In an op-ed last November, current Haaretz publisher Amos Schocken portrayed Israel as a country verging on apartheid.
During the week in question, January 29-February 3, Haaretz published 30 op-eds. Fifteen of these could be called neutral on political, left-right issues. Exactly oneby Haaretzs sole regular right-wing columnist, Israel Harelwas a discussion from a right-wing perspective. Of the other 14, 11 were virulently left-wing and 3 more moderately so. As for the editorials, all six were harsh attacks on Israeli policy, leadership, and institutions. The following is only a sampling from the week.
On Sunday, Gideon Levy published a piece on a recent poll finding high levels of religious beliefs in the Israeli Jewish population. For instance, 84% believe in God, 70% believe Jews are the chosen people, 76% eat kosher at homefigures far beyond the approximately 25% of the Jewish population that is formally observant. This poll, to put it mildly, did not sit well with Levy and other Haaretz pundits.
Levy, for his part, wrote:
Expressions of racism toward Arabs and foreigners, Israels arrogant attitude toward international opinionthese too can be explained by the benighted, primeval belief of the majority of Israelis (70 percent ) that we enjoy complete license because You chose us. we are in the West Bank above all because the majority of Israelis believe that it is not only the land of the patriarchs, but that this fact gives us a patrimonial right to sovereignty, to cruelty, to abuse and to occupationand to hell with the position of the international community and the principles of international law, because, after all, we were chosen from among all other peoples.
That is not a valid polemic but, rather, an anti-Semitic rant. As Shmuel Rosner notes regarding the traditional Jewish belief in chosenness,
Theres nothing wrong with such belief. When Americans were asked by Gallup if their nation has a unique character that makes it the greatest country in the world, 80 percent said yes. According to a Pew survey, About half of Americans (49 percent) and Germans (47 percent) agree with the statement, Our people are not perfect, but our culture is superior to others.
Israelis, of course, do not regard chosenness as a license to commit crimes, and Levy cannot cite any evidence that they do. He just asserts it, or spits it would be more accurate.
Also riding the antireligious tide on Sunday, Amir Oren complained that the Israeli army was another kind of army [once], before the chief rabbi of the air force took office, before the religious takeover of aircraft hangars, and their takeover of the rest of the Israel Defense Forces. Oren approvingly quotes an anonymous letter to the chief of staff by a secular air force pilot:
maybe I should let you know that the members of the air force, at least from [a certain] base, will not be meeting with authors, or guides who would teach them about nature and about various places around the country, or scientists or philosophers, or journalists or historians, or people looking at future trends. Only with religious people, who my son describes as crazy. I find no reason to assume that this disease only exists on this one particular base . Dont be surprised if normal soldiers dont find their place in your army of God.
If this sounds like hatred of religious Jews, it is; and it is no less clear that hatred of a category of Jews is anti-Semitism. It should be added that, whatever legitimate controversies may exist about religions role in the Israeli army, one reason it has become more prominent there is that religious Israelis now disproportionately volunteer to be officers and combat soldiersa fact I didnt come across anywhere in Haaretzs rants.
And Sundays editorial weighed in on the failed (except that all serious commentators knew they didnt stand a chance) Israeli-Palestinians talks in Jordan, saying these were intentionally scuttled by Israel and adding:
Netanyahu, with [Defense Minister Ehud] Baraks help, has turned the Iranian nuclear threat into an impressive ploy to distract attention from settlement policy and the perpetuation of the occupation . The death certificate of negotiations based on the two-state solution is a badge of shame for Israeli society. Its hard to understand how a society that has so impressively brought social injustice to the top of the agenda has fallen victim to our nationalist-religious leaders criminal ploy.
Here it should be noted that neither Netanyahu noreven less soBarak is considered religious in Israeli terms. But these bad characters, we seewith Israeli society in toware leading the world by the nose on the Iranian-nuke issue so they can tighten their grip on the West Bank. If this reminds you of Walt, Mearsheimer, Patrick Buchanan, & Co., it shouldand its coming from a made-in-Israel website.
That Israel is an apartheid state is, of course, another shibboleth of contemporary anti-Semitism. It was well represented in Haaretz on Monday by Druze writer and contributor Salman Masalha who, in another crude rant, drew direct parallels between Israel and apartheid South Africa. Then there was Akiva Eldar, whose tirade also featured the crafty, peace-destroying Netanyahu:
If Netanyahu had not existed, the settlers would have been forced to invent him. It has cost him peanuts to remove some of the roadblocks in the West Bank, to lift part of the blockade on the Gaza Strip, and to pay a bit of lip service to the peace process. And, he has managed to preserve all the settlers interests.
Fact: It is possible to gobble up additional territories and also be depicted as a moderate leader while managing to keep relations with the United States and Europe intact.
The settlers can relax. The general positions outlined last week in Jordan to the Palestinians [were] nothing more than another exercise aimed at presenting Netanyahu as a partner to peace and the Palestinians as the ones who turn it down .
Tricky Jews at it again; all is subterfuge, dont believe a word they say.
Especially offensive, though, was Mondays column by Merav Michaeli, who also focused on the poll that so upset Gideon Levy but found a different significance in it:
The issue that should have sparked panic in the survey is the total consensus among Israeli Jews that the guiding principle for the country and for Judaism itself is to remember the Holocaust. Ninety-eight percent of the respondents consider it either fairly important or very important to remember the Holocaust, attributing to it even more weight than to living in Israel, the Sabbath, the Passover seder and the feeling of belonging to the Jewish people.
Thats the way it is with traumas . Trauma leads to belligerence and a strong tendency to wreak havoc on ones surroundings .
A very high societal awareness of the Holocaustcause for panic! From a non-Haaretz perspective, this might be seen as an educational success and a welcome phenomenon. Holocaust survivors, it can be assumed, regard it that way, and so would the victims. But for columnist Michaeli, its something that drives Israelis to beat up on othersagain, a familiar canard of the anti-Semites.
On Tuesday Avirama Golan gave her take on Israeli secondary education:
from year to year, Israeli children will participate in experiential tours in Israel and abroad. First they will lift their heads in national pride in the City of David and shed a Jewish tear at the Western Wall . Two years later they will march with a huge Israeli flag in the suburbs of Warsaw, will hate Poles and will swear to take revenge on the Palestinians . Never mind. In any case these children will be drafted, will be welcomed to the army by the rabbi of the base, who will blow the shofar in their honor. Its better if theyre prepared.
Its nasty, leering stuff, and its anti-Semitic by any reasonable definition.
It was more of the same on Wednesday. Bradley Burston heaped some more demonization on the Israeli leadership:
If were lucky, the threat (no more than the threat) of an Iran attack (Bibi and Baraks Glory Days Redux fantasy) will be just one more dodge to keep settlers and their opponents at bay: long enough to make it to elections, long enough to get another fix of power . Alternatively, they could do the bidding of the hard right. Shun the left, exploit the center, build like mad in the settlements and bomb Iran for good measure.
By now it should be emerging thataside from portraying Israel as a country that touts a phony Iranian threat for its own nefarious purposes, or might start a Middle Eastern conflagration for its own sneaky reasonsHaaretz is not fond of the settlers. The fury toward Israelis who live in the West Banknow numbering well over 300,000 and covering the full sociological spectrumclearly smacks of pathological obsession. Wednesdays column by Zvi Barel directed still more abuse at these people, depicting them as taking over the country while perhaps being willing to give Israel equal rights under conditions dictated by the invaders of the hills.
Thursday was somewhat quieter, with the aforementioned column by right-winger Harel and a few neutrals. But Ari Shavit came through with:
Over the past three years, Netanyahu has succeeded in decimating the lefts belief in peace with the Palestinians, and he is en route to destroying the worlds hopes as well. He has managed to convince both the Americans and the Europeans that the main topic on the worlds agenda must be Iran .
And Haaretz was back in full force on Friday. Yoel Marcus:
The most worrying survey showed that 80 percent of Israelis believe in God . this number is another element in the weakening of the left, the strengthening of the right, the reinforcement of the rabbis rule and the sanctity of the territoriesand the continuation of the Bibi regime.
Former Knesset member and cabinet minister Yossi Sarid offered an imaginary letter to his parents by an Israeli schoolchild taken on a school tour of Hebron:
They should stop telling us storieswere not children anymore. With our own eyes we saw the settlers acting like the bosses, telling the soldiers and the policemen what to do. Once I saw a movie called To Hell and Back, and thats a pretty good description of the day we had. We discovered a grave new world, in which an abomination becomes a righteous deed, as long as its performed by authority of the Torah, of course . Im going to have to rethink everything, after I found out that God has more support than Netanyahu here: at least 80 percent, and a majority is a majority. Just as murder is murder . I trust our education minister will examine our memories to discover what Hebron did to us as a city that really stinks.
And Doron Rosenblum:
It has become difficult in this country to distinguish, at least on the visual level, between a ceremony to dedicate a new Torah scroll and a walk to the cabinet meeting by the prime minister (who is good for the Jews) and his entourage of skullcap- and kerchief-wearers.
To sum up, then, the gleanings from one week of Haaretzs opinion articles: the Jewish religion is primitive and benighted, and Israeli Jews exploit it to abuse others. Religious Jews are taking over Israel and the Israeli army and constitute a disease in that army. Israeli is solely and deliberately responsible for the failure of Israeli-Palestinian talks, and craftily uses the Iranian threat to deceive Americans and Europeans and advance its goals. Israel is an apartheid state. Israelis are driven by the Holocaust to wreak havoc on others. Israeli schoolchildren are inculcated with a ludicrous religion, Judaism, and learn to hate Poles and Palestinians. Israel may bomb Iran just so its prime minister and defense minister can please the hard right. The settlers are demons, entirely evil.
One of Israels main enemies? Haaretzs English website is certainly that, as it spews this vile nonsense all over the world. Der Stürmer? With its hatred and defamation of the Israeli Jewish people and of Judaism in general, its volleys of anti-Semitic stereotypes, Haaretz is not far off.
Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.
Article printed from FrontPage Magazine: http://frontpagemag.com
URL to article: http://frontpagemag.com/2012/02/17/israel%e2%80%99s-anti-semitic-rag/
If youd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
Haaretz was never Israel’s New York Times. That would be the Jerusalem Post. Haaretz would be more like the New York Post.
Self depricacting Jew are worse than O’ man calling himself a Chistian
Self depricacting Jews
are worse than O’ man calling himself a Chistiansb
Haaretz was always an enigma to me. Powerful article, thanks.
I have never even heard of Hayom and I have read a lot about Israel on this site.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.