[MayflowerMadam]

“And liberals, believe it or not, are rooting for the Newt.”

Of course they are; Newt’s chances of winning against Obama are nil. Grumpy, chubby, white guy preaching responsibility vs. slick, jive-talkin’ black dude promising everything... they’d love Newt as our candidate.

[mazda77]

"they’d love Newt as our candidate."

Yea, right./sarc All while pimping the mime that Mitt is the one they want to run against, in effect pumping his status as in somehow being the one they are most afraid of?

[Patton@Bastogne]

.


CUI BONO ? ... regarding Willard's "attempted" destruction of Newt Gingrich ?

1) Barack Hussein Obama ... who is TERRIFIED of meeting President Gingrich in the 2012 debates ...

2) The Liberal Media, for whom President Gingrich will savagely "eat" their lunch daily ...

3) The GOP E-RINO group ... who DESPISE genuine Tea Party American Conservatives ...

4) Willard Romney ...




ALL these parties have either conveniently "looked the other way" or directed mega-millions to Willard's campaign ...



When the remark is made that "There's no a dime's difference between Republicans and Democrats" ...

They're CORRECT ... at least when referring to the Orin Hatch, Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, George and Barbara Bush, Willard Romney ... "well-heeled" elites ...

However ... there's a King's ransom worth of difference between Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin versus Nancy Pelosi (footnote-1) and George Soros ...

and that difference ... that WILL resonate with American voters in the 2012 election ... TERRIFIES the above group (items 1-4) ...




What's really suprising (AMAZING !) here is that liberal Chris Matthews has "clearly" articulated the TRUTH in his comments ...

it's a rare event for Chris Matthews, and one must wonder "WHY ?" ...

At any rate, Chris's remarks certained ruined Willard's Breakfast this morning ... and that good enough for me ...




=================================



Foot Note 1:

It's understandable that someone might respond to this post by correctly reminding us about the "infamous" Newt Gingrich and Nancy Pelosi "couch photo" ...

... saying that there's not a "dime's difference" between Gingrich and Pelosi ...

I genuinely can see that point ... but only for about two seconds ...



The historical fact is that there is a Galaxy's Difference between Newt and Nancy ....


1) Would Nancy Pelosi ever wish to "fire" the EPA ?

NEVER.


2) Would Nancy Pelosi ever wish to "fire" idiot Non-Constitutional Federal Judges sitting on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ?

NEVER.


3) Would Nancy Pelosi ever wish to "repeal" Obama Care ?

NEVER.


4) Would Nancy Pelosi ever wish revitalize America's vision for space and technology by proposing a Lunar Colony ?

NEVER.


5) Would Nancy Pelosi ever wish to "execute-kill" (with extreme prejudice) American citizens (turned Traitors) who daily work with the Taliban and Islamic Jihad to murder Americans and destroy Israel ?

NEVER.


6) Would Nancy Pelosi ever wish to "repeal" Sarbanes-Oxley ?

NEVER.


7) Would Nancy Pelosi ever wish to offer Americans a "choice" between a 15-percent FLAT TAX and the current IRS convoluted tax system ?

NEVER.




.

[McGruff]

Newt’s chances of winning against Obama are nil. Grumpy, chubby, white guy preaching responsibility vs. slick, jive-talkin’ black dude promising everything... they’d love Newt as our candidate.

Apparently you haven't been watching any of the debates. All our guys turned into chickens. With Obama it would be like clubbing a baby seal.