Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne

He’s right.

I doesn’t matter how awesome anyone here thinks it is, if this guy wants to go into this territory he had better have a good follow-up strategy to keep control of the story for when the MSM, and their 24/7 SHTF megaphone goes full steam.

According to this article, he didnt have one other than to back off.


43 posted on 02/20/2012 1:22:26 PM PST by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: VanDeKoik; nuconvert

Guys, there’s something that bothers me about our cause. It’s that we continually treat our candidates as if they were adversaries.

Obama could take a dump on a church podium and his faithful would back his play, explaining it was an act of respect.

Our guy actually tells the truth, and Conservatives do their best rendition of what cockroaches do when the lights go on.

If the guy is doing something wrong, then by all means address it for being wrong. Quit lining up to damn him for taking a chance that will cost him the election, for doing nothing more or less than telling the truth.

VanDeKoik, I do agree that backing down is a bad idea. I would advise folks to fire off emails to the campaign team to advise them to only back down when something is clearly not true.

Adding to the rumble of anti-Santorum rhetoric around here, isn’t the best way to support a guy you would vote for.


53 posted on 02/20/2012 1:42:25 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Abortion? No. Gov't heath care? No. Gore on warming? No. McCain on immigration? No.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson