Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich woos with prospect of $2 gallon gas
Money.com ^ | February 20, 2012 6:05 PM ET | BRIAN BAKST

Posted on 02/20/2012 5:52:44 PM PST by Red Steel

TULSA, Okla. (AP) - Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich is dangling the prospect of gas as low as $2 a gallon if he's elected.

The former House speaker has spoken in the past of gas dropping to $2.50 a gallon under a Gingrich administration. Monday's prediction, coming as Gingrich campaigned in Oklahoma, contrasts sharply with rival Rick Santorum, who told an Ohio audience that big-city Americans should brace themselves for $5-a-gallon gas.

Both candidates are citing new sensitivity over rising pump prices to push for relaxed regulation on domestic oil production.

According to AAA's daily fuel gauge, the national average Monday for a gallon of regular gas was $3.56.

Gingrich and Santorum have been highlighting oil exploration in North Dakota and slamming the Obama administration for delaying a Canada-to-Texas oil pipeline.

Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich dangled the prospect of gas as low as $2 a gallon if he's elected, playing off voter angst about rising prices at the pump.

The former House speaker has spoken in the past of gas dropping to $2.50 a gallon under a Gingrich administration. Monday's prediction came as Gingrich campaigned in Oklahoma, where the oil and natural gas sector is vital to a bustling state economy.

"With Gingrich policies, what we know is we will dramatically expand our independence in the world market, dramatically expand our capacity to produce energy without regard to our foreign potential enemies and in the process prices will clearly be a lot lower," Gingrich said. "Now, I picked $2.50 as a stabilizing price for capital investment reasons. It could easily go down to $2."

According to AAA's daily fuel gauge, a gallon of regular gas was approaching $4 in some places and even topped it in California.

(Excerpt) Read more at money.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; US: Oklahoma
KEYWORDS: gingrich; newt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-129 next last
To: bigdaddy45

$3 six pack? $5 Ribeye?

I’m with you all the way!


21 posted on 02/20/2012 6:08:43 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

[We all know that’s BS.]

BS is thinking gas has to be $5 a gallon.


22 posted on 02/20/2012 6:09:36 PM PST by DaxtonBrown (http://www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Michael Barnes

A barrel of oil on the open international market is over $100. There is no WAY you’re going to get $2 gas at that price. The removal of what “government excess” exactly is going to get the price of a barrel of oil down to $50?


23 posted on 02/20/2012 6:09:36 PM PST by bigdaddy45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Michael Barnes

It’s the most basic economic question.

Increase the supply. Supply meets and exceed demand that creates competition, and the consumers benefit from the competition by lower prices.


24 posted on 02/20/2012 6:09:51 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bigdaddy45
How do YOU back up that Newt could wave a magic wand and make gasoline $2 a gallon?\

You can't back that up. Newt is still my preferred candidate, but that he's lowered himself to Michelle Bachmann at her lowest says a lot about his expectations.

25 posted on 02/20/2012 6:11:22 PM PST by BfloGuy (The final outcome of the credit expansion is general impoverishment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: thatjoeguy

In 1970 you could buy a great car brand new for $5000. We’ll never see that price again. Does pointing that out make me “scary”?


26 posted on 02/20/2012 6:12:01 PM PST by bigdaddy45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
I remember $.19/9 per gallon

I remember $0.15 per gallon in the early 70s in northeastern Oklahoma. Gas wars were frequent and common. That ended about 1973 when prices started a stead rising.
27 posted on 02/20/2012 6:12:01 PM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CainConservative

Didn’t Bachmann suggest something like this back in September? And if I remember, she was lampooned for it.


28 posted on 02/20/2012 6:12:35 PM PST by parksstp (I pick Rick! (If he's good enough for Mark Levin and Rush Limbaugh, he's good enough for me))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Desperation


29 posted on 02/20/2012 6:12:50 PM PST by stuck_in_new_orleans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Sold


30 posted on 02/20/2012 6:12:56 PM PST by Flavius (What hopes for victory, Gaius Crastinus? What grounds for encouragement ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth; Jim Robinson

“Eminently desirable for average commuting suburban Americans. Of course, this offer is as much advertisment of whoredom as an increase of minimum wage increase to the SEIU thugs. Why not offer free cheese, Newt, you whore?”

Don’t think your word is acceptable. I suggest you lose that word when referring to Newt.


31 posted on 02/20/2012 6:13:14 PM PST by Marcella ((Newt will smash Hussein in debates. Newt needs money.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth

[Why not offer free cheese, Newt, you whore? ]

Santorum you gay castratti, don’t you realize gas was at $2.50 relatively recently? If you put curbs on the Fed (Gingrich’s idea, not Santorum’s) and opened the fields for drilling, this would most certainly happen.


32 posted on 02/20/2012 6:13:45 PM PST by DaxtonBrown (http://www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: stuck_in_new_orleans
Desperation

Nope.

33 posted on 02/20/2012 6:13:57 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Christie at the beach
It must be liberals on this thread-making every excuse in
the book not to have a solid turn out-it’s doom and can”t do attitude. Bitch about nothing getting done, then when someone promises a big change (which it can work as Newt explained), the hands fly out with magic wands and stubbornness. No wonder we are in such trouble. ( if Newt gets in, there will be lower gas prices again since he will set forth better polices)
34 posted on 02/20/2012 6:15:00 PM PST by Christie at the beach (I like Newt and would love to see political dead bodies on the floor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel; onyx

I see it, Red. Probably here we go again. Hope not.


35 posted on 02/20/2012 6:16:20 PM PST by Marcella ((Newt will smash Hussein in debates. Newt needs money.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Christie at the beach

uhhh....nooo..... you know what it sounds like? “Hope and Change”. With nothing to back it up. Sound familiar?


36 posted on 02/20/2012 6:16:50 PM PST by bigdaddy45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

I owned a ‘66 Chevy with the 396 rat motor. I think i got 8 miles to the gallon but it didn’t matter.


37 posted on 02/20/2012 6:16:58 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Beware the Sweater Vest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: DaxtonBrown
Santorum you gay castratti ...

What was it, the sweater vests that gave it away?

38 posted on 02/20/2012 6:17:15 PM PST by al44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
[Pandering is pandering.]

Sort of the way Santorum panders for manufacturers.

39 posted on 02/20/2012 6:17:15 PM PST by DaxtonBrown (http://www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: bigdaddy45

First off by reducing Government, i.e. taxes on individuals and corporations. Secondly by tossing into the trash bin our current (STUPID) energy policy (”blends” of gasolines) and finally, getting rid of entire Federal Agencies (EPA for starters) and making these asinine lawsuits the greenies bring “loser pays” expenses by doing what Newt said, start arresting some judges that are legislating from the bench (siding with their ideology; my words).


40 posted on 02/20/2012 6:17:23 PM PST by Michael Barnes (Obamaa+ Downgrade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson