Skip to comments.
Poll: Carter 63%, Reagan 32%
Charleston (WV) Daily Mail ^
| February 21, 2012
| Don Surber
Posted on 02/21/2012 7:06:41 AM PST by Mustang Driver
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
To: Mustang Driver
All Republicans need to get behind the candidate who can win, hold their noses as necessasry, and back that candidate. Divided we fall.
2
posted on
02/21/2012 7:13:59 AM PST
by
Rapscallion
(The best way to enforce "fairness" is tyranny. Begone Obama.)
To: Mustang Driver
Repubs aren’t attacking Obama right now (HUGE MISTAKE in my mind), while both Repubs and Democrats are driving Republican Negatives up.
3
posted on
02/21/2012 7:14:10 AM PST
by
tcrlaf
(Election 2012: THE RAPTURE OF THE DEMOCRATS)
To: Mustang Driver
BHO is in political trouble. The question is whether he will lose the election or not.
You have a different electorate today than in 1980
4
posted on
02/21/2012 7:14:19 AM PST
by
LMAO
("Begging hands and Bleeding hearts will only cry out for more"...Anthem from Rush)
To: Rapscallion
All Republicans need to get behind the candidate who can win, hold their noses as necessasry, and back that candidate. Divided we fall.Right now in the primaries, I am in "anybody but Romney (and Paul)" mode. After the primaries, I will revert to "anybody but Obama" mode.
5
posted on
02/21/2012 7:16:26 AM PST
by
Sans-Culotte
( Pray for Obama- Psalm 109:8)
Comment #6 Removed by Moderator
To: Mustang Driver
Not ONLY that BUT.............
ALL POLLs are simply propaganda, even if they go in the favor of what you want to happen..
Propaganda for weak minds.. stronger constitutions have already made their decisions..
Polls manipulate weak minds.. or people stuck on stupid..
7
posted on
02/21/2012 7:19:34 AM PST
by
hosepipe
(This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole...)
To: tcrlaf
I agree with this, but the American electorate has an extremely short attention span. Waiting to pound him until after the Repub candidate is fine.
I’m hopeful that whoever the nominee is, the party will be united come election time.
Getting Obama out is paramount to the survival of this country and all resources need to be pooled together after the nominee is selected.
To: Mustang Driver
At or below 50% is bad for an incumbent.
9
posted on
02/21/2012 7:21:43 AM PST
by
Impy
(Don't call me red.)
To: Sans-Culotte
"Right now in the primaries, I am in "anybody but Romney (and Paul)" mode. After the primaries, I will revert to "anybody but Obama" mode." That is me to a "T". I am not over joyed with our selections, but I will get behind whoever gets it even if its the nut case (Paul)
10
posted on
02/21/2012 7:22:56 AM PST
by
DeaconRed
(Cold War Veteran. . . . US Army Security Agency 1964-1968)
To: Mustang Driver
Thank you. I am old enough to remember Jimmah. I even remember him as governor of Ga when I lived in Atlanta.
It was very similar to today as some idiots loved Jimmah.
Reagan who we knew very little about trounced Jimmah and sent him home to tend to his peanuts.
ZERO will also be sent packing. . . . .
11
posted on
02/21/2012 7:28:58 AM PST
by
DeaconRed
(Cold War Veteran. . . . US Army Security Agency 1964-1968)
To: Mustang Driver
Reagan was able to throttle and totally overcome Carter in the debates. Romney can’t do that.
To: Rapscallion
As Mark Steyn said on Rush, we’re going to have a flawed candidate, and it’s up to us to drag him across the finish line a winner.
13
posted on
02/21/2012 7:32:16 AM PST
by
nascarnation
(DEFEAT BARAQ 2012 DEPORT BARAQ 2013)
To: Sans-Culotte
Right now in the primaries, I am in "anybody but Romney (and Paul)" mode. After the primaries, I will revert to "anybody but Obama" mode. At this point, I'm almost in the "anybody but Romney, Paul Santorum, or Gingrich" mode, though I lean Newt. But as you said, when it comes time for the general, it will be anybody but Obama.
It would have been nice to have someone to really vote for rather than just voting against Obama, but in the end, my vote will go the same way anyway.
No matter what anyone thinks about any of these four candidates, all of them have at least a chance to be better than Obama, and I don't see any of them as being worse. And no matter who we elect will still need the GOP for support, which will pull them further to the right than they might be otherwise.
We must beat Obama.
Comment #15 Removed by Moderator
To: Mustang Driver
Your right on target. How soon the public forgets and the media continues to cover the facts with garbage. I’ve bet a lot of people just what you have researched. I knew it to be true without researching the fact that back when Reagan was going to run Carter was so far ahead of the opposition it stuck in my head that it was impossible. Inflation was 18% interest rates were 20+% and Carter was leading??? Today all numbers are rigged to explode later in time so it doesn’t look as bad, but what this idiot in the WH has done is enough to be able to predict it is impossible for him to win. God hear my prayer!!!
16
posted on
02/21/2012 7:33:40 AM PST
by
bramps
(Newt is the one)
To: Rapscallion
Divided we fall.
And for the past months, this site has been leading the charge - much to my dismay.
17
posted on
02/21/2012 7:35:45 AM PST
by
ErnBatavia
(Carterize Obama in November)
To: Sans-Culotte
Right now in the primaries, I am in "anybody but Romney (and Paul)" mode. After the primaries, I will revert to "anybody but Obama" mode.
I know you say that with a certain amount of pride, however, all you have proven is that you are a willing and usefull tool of the GOP-E.
By making a public statement like that, all you've said to the GOP-E, is that they can manipulate, and cheat a lousy rotten candidate like Mitt Romney, whose record proves he is a progressive liberal, to the nomination and you will just roll over and vote for someone who is the antithesis of your conservative principles and a serial liar.
Congratulations!
The manipulation of the GOP-E has been successful where you are concerned.
As for me, Mitt Romney will never get the votes of either myself or my family.
I don't vote for someone who has an 'R' next to their name.
I vote for honest conservatives.
Mitt fails the "honest" part and he fails the "conservative" part.
To: ErnBatavia
And for the past months, this site has been leading the charge - much to my dismay.
Are you talking about the fight to oust Romney with the truth of his record, or are you referring to the fight between Gingrich, Perry, Cain, and Santorum supporters?
To: nascarnation
As Mark Steyn said on Rush, were going to have a flawed candidate, and its up to us to drag him across the finish line a winner.
Not if it is Mitt Romney.
Conservatives don't drag a Progressive LYING Liberal, as Romney's record as Governor shows that he is, across the finish line.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson