Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: elkfersupper
Campaign finance laws are and have always been a sham designed to protect incumbents.

I'm not sure it's to protect incumbents. Isn't there some guy out there threatening to give Newt $100M? I think it's more that the political class wants to pretend that no one is buying them.

Want to stop this BS?

No direct contributions to candidates. All money must go anonymously through a monitored third party which hides the identity of the donor much as a voter's identity is hidden.

ML/NJ

12 posted on 02/21/2012 5:19:15 PM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: ml/nj

monitored third party

By whom ?


15 posted on 02/21/2012 5:38:56 PM PST by al baby (Hi Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: ml/nj

Wrong. Monetary contributions are free speech - Constitutionally protected. The correct prescription to corruption is no limits, no currency and total disclosure.


23 posted on 02/21/2012 7:34:27 PM PST by elkfersupper ( Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson