Posted on 02/21/2012 6:43:27 PM PST by katiedidit1
GINGRICH: The President of the United States is patriotic in a worldview that involves the writing of Saul Alinsky, and involves a radical reinterpretation. Clearly, his czars were unconstitutional; clearly, his recess appointments, when there was no recess, is unconstitutional; clearly, the use of the U.S. attorney in North Dakota to selectively prosecute oil companies over eight migratory birds is unconstitutional. Again and again, this is a president who routinely only obeys those laws he personally deems fit. I think that his attack on the Catholic Church is unconstitutional. It's a violation of the First Amendment. Now, I think that's an important debate for us to have as a country.
(Excerpt) Read more at mrc.org ...
Note. Must watch pbs..gag..the billy jeff years. Last night round 1 ended with Noot coming on the scene! :) :) to be a pain in the liberal agenda...
Ping for later read. Thanks for posting!
I think Newt handed Rose his ass—not to put too fine a point on it.
Gingrich should have said.......”I question everything about the man as it seems nobody else has the capacity to do so.”
Why would anyone question his patriotism? /s
Hey, Katie, he sure did. Go, Newt.
An entire election campaign platform in a single paragraph. Including a bitch-slap to little bammy.
Typical Newt precision.
.
Newt can make this jerk go away.
President Newt Gingrich—”Our beloved republic deserves nothing less.”
2+2=4 and Charlie Rose can’t stand the truth, cuz he believes 2+2=27 .
That’s the Newt I love(ed), that is until he began setting on liberal couches making TV commercials on global warming and cap and trade... which begged the question, WTF! If he can see his way to never, ever, EVER do that sh!t again, I can see supporting him.
To islam and marxism!
2+2=4 and Charlie Rose can’t stand the truth, cuz he believes 2+2=27 and Obama is a genius.
Wow! Not sure how somebody who normally watches Charlie Rose would take it, but reading that transcript I think Newt was inspired!
ROSE: That brings us to President Obama. You believe that he wants to see more expensive gas, you have said? [CBS News Graphic: "Politics Of Gas Prices: Gingrich On His $2 Per Gallon Claim"] GINGRICH: Of course, he does. Come on, Charlie. You know that. I mean, he has said it himself. [Steven] Chu, his Secretary of Energy, said he wanted- in 2008, said he wanted gasoline prices in America to get to the European level, which is nine or $10 a gallon. Last year, the President said people ought to buy- they shouldn't complain about higher gas prices. They ought to buy more efficient cars. The President himself said he wants to get there. He just wants it to be gradual. His policy has been outrageously anti-American energy. The high price of gasoline is a direct result of Obama. We paid $1.13 a gallon when I was Speaker. We paid a $1.89 a gallon when he became President. His policies are anti-American energy. They exist in a fantasy world, where we're all going to end up buying an electric car, for which his new budget puts in a $10,000 subsidy per car. You think about what you can do for average working Americans if you want to hand them a $10,000 check. The average person who buys a [Chevy] Volt has a $170,000 annual income. So President Obama, in effect, is giving income redistribution to the wealthy, and in pursuit of his own fantasy, which is an electric car ,which is going to liberate us from Saudi Arabia. I want to have American drilling- oil, natural gas, use of coal, nuclear power, solar, biological, wind. I want American energy, which is practical and available now, to liberate us from Saudi Arabia-
I don't think he was nearly as hard on Romney as he was on Obama. I also think he was being perfectly fair in both cases.
Ha, thanks for the reminder..forgot about that huge remark!
Am I questioning Obama’s patriotism?
You betcha.
Newt Rips Gore's 'Facts' To Pieces
I can't believe people are still dragging up that tired nonsense about "sitting on a couch with Pelosi." Is his fashion sense good enough to be President? Does he know enough about sports?
Newt should stop using liberal language by calling the Volt an “electric” car. It is a battery powered car. Your gasoline powered auto generates its own, actual electricity through the alternator as the engine runs. Electricity, generated by your car is critical to its operation. The volt powers electric motors by a battery pack.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.